【作者】 杨华；

【导师】 王丽萍；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律， 2010， 硕士

【副题名】以“人肉搜索”为切入点

【摘要】 当今社会,人们日益享受着网络所带来的便利,但由于网络行为所特有的属性,隐私在网络上的保护则遭受到了前所未有的挑战,如近年来兴起的“人肉搜索”,就是一个典型的例子。“人肉搜索”就是指利用现代信息科技,变传统的网络信息搜索(机器搜索)为人找人、人问人、人碰人、人挤人、人挨人的关系型网络社区活动,从某种意义上讲,“人肉搜索”是网络中一种高效率的实现信息资源共享的互助行为,但同时“人肉搜索”却极易侵犯公民的网络隐私权。网络隐私权在本质上仍然是隐私权,具有传统隐私权的基本特征和基本内容,只是隐私权在网络环境下的延伸。但是由于网络社会的虚拟性、开放性、多技术性和数字化等特性,导致网络隐私权与传统隐私权在隐私范围、侵权行为方式等方面有所不同。“人肉搜索”侵害网络隐私权的侵权构成要件包括网络隐私侵权行为、须有损害事实的客观存在、行为人主观上有过错、侵权行为与损害结果之间具有因果关系。“人肉搜索”侵害网络隐私权的原因主要有法律制度原因、公民权利意识淡薄的原因、网络本身具有高效性与匿名性的原因。“人肉搜索”侵权责任主体通常包括直接侵权人和间接侵权人两类。直接侵权人一般是指“人肉搜索”的发起者、信息发布者、信息的整理总结者；间接侵权人主要是指网络服务提供商。目前,国际上保护网络隐私权的模式主要有三种,分别是行业自律模式、技术保护模式和法律保护模式。我国在选择网络隐私权的保护模式时,应该综合三者的优点,建立以法律保护为核心,行业自律为补充,技术保护为支持的综合保护模式。我国隐私权保护的立法规定散见于多种法律、法规、司法解释及规章中,并且存在诸多的问题。为完善对网络隐私权的保护,我国需要做好以下几个方面的工作：1、制定一部综合统一的保护网络隐私权的法律；2、适时制定其他相关的特别法；3、构建网民、网络服务提供者的行为规范体系；4、明确侵犯网络隐私权的民事责任的承担方式；5、证据保全制度的完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 In today’s society, while more convenience is brought about by the network day by day, the specific property of network behavior makes privacy an unprecedented challenge. The so-called "Internet man hunt" in late days is an example to the point."Internet man hunt" refers to a community activity highlighting relationships among mankind by various means of finding, asking, linking, etc. through one another. It brings traditional network information accumulation ways into a new form by utility of modern information technology. In s sense, "Internet man hunt "is a mutual aid action of information sharing with high efficiency, meanwhile, it turns out to be easily to violate internet privacy right of civil persons.Internet Privacy right is to itself a privacy right with all the basic characteristics of the traditional right. It is an extension of privacy right under network environment. However, due to the virtual nature, openness, technical and digital features of network community, there is some differences in privacy scope, violation ways between internet privacy right and the traditional privacy right.The violation elements of "Internet man hunt" include privacy infringement, real damage, the subjective fault of perpetrator, causal relationship between conducts and the damage.The reasons of "Internet man hunt" violating internet privacy right include legal system, legal awareness of civil persons, efficiency and anonymity of internet inself.The main tort liability of"Internet man hunt" usually involves direct infringement person and indirect infringement person. Direct infringement person generally refers to the initiators, information publishers, and information collectors; indirect infringement person mainly refers to network service providerAt present, there are mainly three modes of protecting internet privacy, namely, industry self-regulation mode, technology protection mode and legal protection mode. China should integrate the advantages of the three modes and establish a comprehensive protection mode with legal protection the core, industry self-regulation the supplement and technological protection the backbone.Articles of privacy protection in our country are scattered in various laws, regulations, judicial interpretations and regulations, and there are many problems. To improve the protection of internet privacy, China needs to do the following work:to draft a comprehensive integrated network privacy protection law; to formulate other relevant special laws in time; to build standard conduct system of internet users and network service providers; to clear responsibility of privacy violation; to improve evidence preservation system.更多还原