节点文献
公司法人人格否认诉讼程序研究
Disregard of Corporate Personality Study Proceedings
【作者】 陈志刚;
【导师】 陈乃新;
【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 , 法律, 2009, 硕士
【摘要】 法人人格独立和股东有限责任是构建公司制度大厦的两大基石。随着1993年公司法的颁布施行,公司因有了有限责任制度而得到大量的投资,因而得到了蓬勃的发展。然而,在股东追求资本利益最大化的过程中,公司法人独立人格和股东有限责任出现异化,即出现了各种滥用公司法人人格、危害公司债权人利益和社会公共利益的行为。因此,2005年10月27日通过的新《公司法》,在立法层面上规定了公司法人人格否认的原则。公司法的规定,只是意味着法人人格否认由理论上升到了实体法的层面,它只是法律原则,实体法必须有赖于诉讼程序才能得以实现。只有在诉讼程序上做出细致、合理的安排,公司法人格否认原则的公平、正义本性才能得以实现。本文正是试图站在司法角度,探讨公司法人人格否认诉讼程序之相关属性和制度安排,研究如何在司法实践中具体贯彻公司法人人格否认原则,研究适用何种条件和程序对特定法律关系中的公司独立人格和股东有限责任予以否认,企望为司法机关制定有关司法解释,以及法官在现阶段审理相关案件提供参考。文章分析了公司法人人格否认诉讼程序的权利义务指向,认为公司法人人格否认之诉以法人人格权为基础,是侵权之诉。它不但侵犯了公司债权人的财产权,同时也侵犯了公司本身以及公司其他股东的合法权益,间接侵害了社会公共利益。其侵权主体要件、主观要件、行为要件、结果要件、因果关系要件等都要符合侵权诉讼的要求。但是,作为一种新的诉讼形式,在受案范围、诉讼主体、案由、诉讼管辖、举证责任以及民事责任承担与分配等方面,公司法人人格否认诉讼都有其特殊性。另外,为完善公司法人人格否认诉讼,从根本上减少公司法人人格否认的机会,本文提出在完善实体法、司法解释、编纂判例汇编、规范工商监管责任、完善董事会义务与上市公司信息披露、完善中介机构责任追究制度、提高债权人风险意识等方面进行必要的改进。
【Abstract】 Independent legal personality and limited liability of shareholders is the company’s system to build two of the cornerstones of buildings. With the promulgation of the 1993 Companies Act, limited liability companies have extensive investment system, which has been vigorous development. However, in the pursuit of capital, maximizing the interests of shareholders in the process of the independent corporate personality and limited liability of shareholders appear alienation, that is, there all kinds of abuse of corporate personality and endanger the interests of creditors of the company and social public interests. Thus, October 27,2005 adopted a new "Company Law", at the legislative level, provides for the principle of disregard of corporate personality. Company Law stipulates that only means to deny legal personality to rise to the substantive law from a theoretical level, it is only legal principles, the substantive law must depend on the proceedings in order to be realized. Only in the proceedings to make detailed, reasonable arrangement, the principle of piercing the corporate veil of fairness, justice, nature can be realized.This paper is trying to stand in the judicial point of view, of disregard of corporate personality of proceedings of the relevant attributes and institutional arrangements on how to implement the judicial practice, specifically the principle of disregard of corporate personality, study what conditions and procedures applicable to a particular legal relationship of the company’s independent personality and limited liability of shareholders to be denied, hoping to develop the relevant judicial interpretations of the judiciary, and judges to hear related cases at this stage provide a reference. This article pointed out that the disregard of corporate personality system itself is in a specific legal relationship to the company’s independent personality of the specific denial, under normal circumstances can not be sued alone, or else become a permanent denial of the disregard of corporate personality, rather than a temporary denial. This paper analyzes the disregard of corporate personality rights and obligations of the proceedings point to that the disregard of corporate personality of v to the right of legal personality, based on a tort. It not only violated the property rights of creditors of the company, but also a violation of the company itself and the company’s legitimate rights and interests of other shareholders, indirectly infringe the social public interests. The main elements of its infringement, the subjective element, behavioral element, the result element of causation, the elements would have to comply with the requirements of tort litigation. However, as a new form of litigation, in the case range, the subject of proceedings, cause of action, litigation jurisdiction, the burden of proof, as well as civil commitment and the allocation of such areas as litigation disregard of corporate personality has its own peculiarities. In addition, the introduction of civil execution system for piercing the corporate veil is also indeed a need and possibilities.