【作者】 王彬；

【导师】 罗章；

【作者基本信息】 重庆大学 ， 行政管理， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 加快行政管理体制改革,压缩政府机构,精简政府工作人员,转变政府职能,建设服务型政府,提高政府工作绩效,促进政府公共服务能力和服务水平的提升,是行政管理体制改革的主要内容和目标。然而,政府行政效率与公共服务水平的高低,在很大程度上取决于中国政府的行政效率、行政能力和服务能力,最终取决于公务员队伍的整体素质和整体能力。因此,建立一支政治坚定、业务精通、清正廉洁、作风优良的公务员队伍,是提高政府绩效,提升政府公共服务能力和水平的关键。作为考察公务员素质和能力的重要手段,公务员考核对促进公务员素质和能力的提高,提高政府行政绩效,提升政府整体的公共服务能力和服务水平,具有明显而重要的作用和意义。但是,作为公务员考核的重要手段或依据的考核指标,还存在着许多问题,如考核指标缺乏整体性、操作性、有效性和科学性等,严重影响到公务员考核的顺利进行,极大地制约了公务员整体素质和政府行政效率的不断提升,对促进政府的建设和完善产生了较为严重的负面影响。为完善公务员考核指标,提高公务员整体素质和能力,促进政府行政效率、公共服务和管理能力的提高与改善,本文从公务员考核指标入手,抓住公务员考核指标的问题,深入分析公务员考核指标存在问题的原因,提出相应的措施或手段解决存在的问题,以促进公务员考核的有序良好开展。通过研究得出,公务员工作实际与考核缺乏有效匹配、考核内容与考核指标缺乏有效衔接、考核的理论和方法的落后或失灵、公务员缺乏科学健全的职位分类等,是公务员考核指标存在问题的根源,其中政府行政理念和职能转变的缓慢,是公务员考核指标存在问题的主要根源。在分析和把握问题根源的基础上,在科学发展观的指导下,结合国内外研究成果,如新公共服务理论等,根据我国现实国情和公务员的具体实际,提出按照客观可行、适度平衡与权变(弹性)等原则,依据《公务员法》等法律法规,提出加强考核指标与考核内容的有效衔接、坚持统筹兼顾、提高和改进考核方法和理论、广纳意见和建议等,旨在增强考核指标的整体性、操作性、科学性和有效性。同时,进一步提出健全公务员分类制度、转变政府行政理念、加快政府职能转变,解决制约考核指标的深层次因素,以实现公务员考核指标的标本兼治,推进公务员考核的顺利进行。更多还原

【Abstract】 Accelerating the reform of administrative system, compressing government agencies, streamlining government personnel, transforming government functions, constructing a service-centered government, improving the service government work performance and promoting the government’s public service ability and the service efficiency , with no exception, are the main contents and the targets of the reform of administrative system. However, the government administrative efficiency and public service level, to the large extent, depend on the administrative efficiency, administrative ability and service ability, do depend eventually on the overall quality of civil servants and overall ability. Therefore, establishing a team of civil servants with firm politics, proficient business, honesty and integrity, a fine style, is the key to improving the performance of the government and the government’s public service ability and level.As the significant means of evaluation civil servants’quality and ability, assessment of the civil servants has obvious and important role and significance in promoting the quality evaluation and civil administration, enhancing the overall performance and the government’s public service ability and service level.But, as an necessary means of civil servants assessment, the evaluation index still exist many problems, such as the lack of integrity, operability, effectiveness and scientific, etc. It seriously influences the implementing civil servants assessment, greatly prohibits the overall quality and efficiency of the government administration, exerts a serious negative impact on promoting the construction and improvement.To improve the index of civil servants assessment and the overall quality and efficiency of the government administration, public service and management ability, this article, from prospective of the civil servants, attaches the importance to the problems of the evaluation index , deeply analyzes its deep reasons and puts forward some corresponding measures to promote its orderly good conduct. Through in-depth research, lack of effective combination between civil servants’practical work and assessment, lack of effective evaluation theory and technology of backward or malfunction, and the lack of scientific management of civil jurisdiction position classification are the source of the problems, of which the slowness of government administrative concept and function of remains the main existing problems of civil servant evaluation indexes.On the basis of analyzing and understanding the root problems, in the guidance of scientific development, through research achievements at home and abroad, such as the new public service theory etc, according to China’s present situation and concrete practice of civil servants, this article provides objectively feasible contingency (moderate balance and elastic).According to the principle of civil law and other laws and regulations, it puts forward the evaluation index and evaluation contents, the effective on improving overall consideration, evaluation methods and theory, inviting opinions and Suggestions to strengthen countermeasures such as evaluation index of integrity, practical, scientific and effective.At the same time, it provides the path to establishing sound classification system of civil servants, transforming government administrative concept, speeding the transformation of government functions, solving the deep factors restricting the evaluation index, so as to realize the evaluation index of civil servants, and promote the specimen examination smoothly.更多还原