【作者】 李坤；

【导师】 陈年冰；

【作者基本信息】 华南理工大学 ， 法律， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 随着计算机技术和网络技术的发展,互联网成为法律捍卫众多知识产权的新战场,我国的信息网络传播权也应运而生。从2001《著作权》的第一次修改,到2006年国务院《信息网络传播权保护条例》的颁布,再到2010年《侵权责任法》第36条的“网络侵权专项条款”出台,我国信息产业的立法保护一直处于不断完善的过程之中。根据法律规范实施的效果来看,我国的信息网络传播权存在诸多不足,如法律规制范围不明确使之与广播权产生错位;又如信息网络传播权侵权行为归责原则不合理、管辖权规定模糊、赔偿标准不统一等使一系列的侵权案件无疾而终,浪费了大量的司法资源,影响了我国信息产业的正常发展。笔者从信息网络传播权的产生渊源和国内立法现状入手,甄选数百个国内典型案例,通过实证研究和对比研究,指出了我国信息网络传播权在立法外延上的缺失和在立法内容中存在的归责原则、权利限制制度等几个方面规定不合理的地方,特别着墨分析了其规制范围的缺失和归责原则不合理两点。并充分理解WCT和WPPT两个条约的内涵,结合国外知识产权强国的立法经验,立足我国的实际情况,特别是结合了《侵权责任法》关于网络侵权方面的规定,提出了自己的完善之法,即:在法律规制范围方面,扩大信息网络传播权的法律规制范围,把广播权明确的纳入到信息网络传播权之中来。立法内容方面,把网络服务提供者先行分类,再分别确定其归责原则;并完善我国信息网络传播权的合理使用制度,防止权利滥用,以更好的保护权利人的合法权益。更多还原

【Abstract】 As the development of technology on computers and network, the internet has become a new battle field of protecting intellectual property rights, therefore Information Network Transmission Right has come into being in our country.The protection of the legislation of information industry is in the process of perfect from the first modification of Copy Right Treaty in 2001 to the release of Regulations issued by the State Council in 2006, and the becoming of Article 36 Special Article on Internet Infringement in Tort Law of China in 2010.There should be many improvements in Information Network Transmission Right based on the effects of implement of legal norm, such as the unclear bond which causes some malposition with broadcasting right. And in addition, the unreasonable doctrine of liability fixation of Information Network Transmission Right, and the vague standard of jurisdiction and un-uniform measure of indemnity, etc. cause a series of infringement cases unsolved, which waste a large quantity of judicial resource effecting the normal development of information industry in our country.The author selected cautiously, from the angle of the origin of Information Network Transmission Right and the present legislative situation, a hundred typical cases to prove the deficiency in denotation of legislation on Information Network Transmission Right and some unreasonable aspects on doctrine of liability fixation, jurisdiction right and measure of indemnity in legislation by the method of empirical study and comparative research. To some extent, the author underlines two unreasonable issues, deficiency in denotation and the doctrine of liability fixation. With complete understanding of WCT and WPPT, and the help of the legislative experience of well developed IPR of other countries, the author puts forward his own measurements basing on our own situation especially considering the internet infringement regulations of Tort Liability Law, i.e. on the aspect of denotation of legislation, define the domain of Information Network Transmission Right reasonably to include broadcast right. And what’s more, on the aspect of legislative content, classify the ISP into two types clarifying their doctrine of liability fixation respectively. And the infringement responsibility includes illegal download and copy. Then work out scientific stipulation of jurisdiction right and measure of indemnity.更多还原