论手机短信证据在民事诉讼中的适用

【作者】 李媛；

【导师】 周晓唯；

【作者基本信息】 西北大学 ， 法学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 手机短信随着信息时代的到来进入民事诉讼领域,在证明案件事实中的关键作用日益凸显,给民事诉讼法带来了一定的冲击。但是,手机短信具有虚拟性、无形性等特点,往往因其极易删除和修改而使人对其在诉讼中作为证据是否真实可靠心存怀疑。因此,如何保障手机短信证据的真实性,使其在诉讼中发挥其应有的证明作用,就是一个不容回避的问题。我国现有的民事诉讼证据制度涉及到手机短信证据的简单而粗糙的规定不能应对实践出现的手机短信证据的诸多问题,导致在我国民事诉讼实践中,对手机短信的证据类型的归属、证据能力、证明力的认定没有统一的规范可依,从而在民事诉讼中有关手机短信证据的案件的处理中存在许多难以解决的问题,影响到民事诉讼解决纠纷目的的实现。笔者以前人的研究为基础,结合我国立法和司法中手机短信运用的现状,深入分析手机短信真实性遭受质疑的原因,对民事诉讼中手机短信证据的有效运用进行系统阐述。本文引用三个案例,以手机短信在实践审判中所遇见的越来越复杂化和专业化的问题入手,依据当事人是否认可的标准将手机短信证据分为两种具体的情况：“对方当事人认可的手机短信证据”、“对方当事人不认可的手机短信证据”,这两种情况具体到现实之中,分别又有不少于三种的情况。笔者试着根据手机短信自身特点,参考电子证据的审查标准和采纳方式,对应提出了具体的处理办法,并且对完善手机短信证据的立法提出了自己的几点建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 While the commencing of Information Age, SMS evidence appear in the field of civil procedure, which has made a great impact on the system of that, and the pivotal role of SMS evidence in ascertaining the facts in issue is increasingly prominent. Such evidence, however, characterized by its virtuality, intangibility, etc., does frequently incur doubt of its authenticity and reliability since it may be deleted or altered easily. Therefore, how to ensure its validity and give it the deserved play in litigation has turned out to be an unavoidable issue. Stipulations relating to the current evidential system in our country are extremely simple and vague, which can no longer keep pace with the problems emerging in the judicial practice. As a result, no relative laws have been enacted to regulate the classification of the evidence, evidence competence and weight of proof, causing problems in handling the cases on SMS evidence and block the way of the realization of the resolution of civil disputes.The author makes a systematic study of both the theories and legislation of SMS evidences, based on an in-depth analysis of the cause of subjecting it to doubt of its truth.This treatise intends to make some instructive efforts to quest how to ensure its validity and give it the deserved play in litigation.The paper begins with three cases, solve the issues in the application of the electronic evidences. SMS evidence is classified into two specific kinds that was "SMS evidence approbated by the opposing party" and "SMS evidence not approbated by the opposing party", according to the criterion of parties’approbation. Above-mentioned two kinds respectively have no fewer than three kinds of circumstances when they are incarnated into the reality. In the basis of characters of SMS evidence, the writer puts forward idiographic countermeasures and brings forward her own advice about the maturity of SMS evidence legislation, with referring to the criterion of examination and mode of adoption on the electronic evidence.更多还原