【作者】 张丽华；

【导师】 黄冬梅；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 应用心理学， 2009， 硕士

【摘要】 对于人格及人格特质的研究,国内外学者一直都比较重视。核心自我评价是美国学者Judge1997年提出的一个人格特质的新概念,它是Judge从自尊、自我效能感、神经质和控制源这四种人格特质抽取出来的一个高阶因素,是个体对自我的能力和价值所持有的最基本的评价。个体对自己的核心自我评价,不仅直接影响个体学习和参与社会活动的积极性,也影响着个体的心理健康水平。目前国内外关于核心自我评价的研究大多集中在组织管理领域,大多以工作满意度和工作绩效为因变量,对它与其他工作和生活变量的相关研究相对比较少。高中学生正处于人格形成和发展的关键时期,良好的核心自我评价是其高中阶段取得成功的重要精神支柱。主观幸福感作为积极心理学的重要组成部分,一直是心理学领域的研究热点,深入研究高中生的核心自我评价和主观幸福感越来越具有现实的需求和意义。本文在翻译国外问卷的基础上,以青岛市高中生为样本,修订了核心自我评价卷,并对相关问卷进行施测,通过独立样本t检验,方差分析和相关分析等统计方法系统研究了青岛市高中生核心自我评价与主观幸福感的现状,并明确了两者之间的相关关系。研究结果发现:(1)经翻译修订的核心自我评价问卷包括8个项目,并具有较好的信效度。(2)青岛市高中生核心自我评价在性别上差异显著,男生高于女生;在家庭结构、家庭来源和年级因素上差异不显著。(3)青岛市高中生主观幸福感在性别上差异显著,女生积极情绪多于男生,在家庭结构、家庭来源和年级因素上均差异不显著。(4)在生活满意度的各个维度中,友谊满意度和家庭满意度平均分最高,环境满意度和学业满意度平均分最低。(5)核心自我评价与生活满意度其各维度、积极情绪存在显著正相关,与消极情绪存在显著负相关。更多还原

【Abstract】 Judge et al.(1997)proposed a new concept of personality trait which they termed core self-evaluation and defined it as basic evaluations that individuals hold about their capabilities and values. According to Judge et al (1997).This concept is a broad dispositional trait which is a higher order factor indicated by four more specific traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control and emotional stability. Since core self-evaluation was proposed by American researcher Judge, the research of core self-evaluation has been drawing a lot of attention of many psychologists. Subjective well-being is the evaluation to the whole quality of life, which is a rule designed by the individuals themselves, it includes two components: cognition and emotion. It is an important comprehensive psychological index to measure the mass of people’s life satisfaction, as an important part of the positive psychology, subjective well-being has been a hot topic in the field of psychology. High school students are in the critical period of character formation and individual development, to study their core self-evaluation and subjective well-being deeply will have special theoretical significance and important practical significance.The purpose of this paper is to study the subjective well-being of high school students in Qingdao from the new perspective of personality traits—core self-evaluation, and clear the relationship between core self-evaluation and subjective well-being. The theoretical significance of this paper is to verify the core self-evaluation theory, so as to win some theoretical innovation in the context of Chinese culture, expand academic horizons, and to promote the communication between different cultures about the personality theory of self. The practical significance of this paper is to explore the adaptability of the core self-evaluation among high school students of Qingdao, and to provide high school students a guidance on understanding and evaluating themselves, and provide the society an evidence to improve the psychological qualities, quality of life and the psychological healthy level of high school students.The research translated the foreign scale first, on this basis, the research took 90 high school students in Qingdao as sample, revised the Core Self-Evaluation Scale, and then the research used the revised Core Self-Evaluation Scale, the Social Support Scale and The State Self-Esteem Scale as research tools, took 250 high school students in Qingdao as sample, used independent sample T-test the single factor variance analysis and the Pearson correlation analysis to statistic, explored the present situation and the relationships between core self-evaluations and subjective well-being. The major work and conclusions of present paper are as follows:First,The Core Self-Evaluations Scale which is translated and revised in the research includes eight items. This scale has good reliability and validity. Second,the core self-evaluation of the high school students of Qingdao have significant differences on gender, boys scored higher than girls .There are no significant difference on family structure, sources or grade.Third, the subjective well-being of the high school students of Qingdao have significant difference on gender, girls have more positive emotion than boys higher than boys .There are no significant difference on family structure, sources or grade.Fourth, in various dimensions of life satisfaction, friendship satisfaction and family satisfaction get the highest average score, the environment satisfaction and academic satisfaction gets the lowest average score.Fifth, there are significant positive correlations between core self-evaluations and life satisfaction with its various dimensions and positive emotions. There is a significant negative correlation between Core self-evaluations and negative emotions更多还原