【作者】 孙洁；

【导师】 刘翔；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 美学， 2009， 硕士

【副题名】在黑格尔与叔本华之间

【摘要】 鲍桑葵将丑列为美学研究的一个分支,足见他对丑的重视。本文将查看基于对黑格尔辩证法的传承,鲍桑葵对丑进行的自觉讨论。鲍桑葵认为在一个具体的和有因果关系的过程中,单纯的否定这种东西是不存在的。他看到一些“丑”是和美辩证统一的,而另一些丑则是不可放在审美范畴里的。他反对叔本华的意志论,也不能完全接受丑是意志的有缺点的表现。讨论前人诸多观点后,鲍桑葵得出的结论是,不可克服的丑是摒弃于真正的艺术之外的,只存在“不忠实和矫揉造作的艺术领域”里,而一些“表面上的丑”则是可以被坚强情感欣赏,并发展成为一种高级的美。更多还原

【Abstract】 Bernard Bosanquet thinks highly of ugliness and lists it as an individual branch of Aesthetics. Based on his heritage and consistency of Hegelian dialectic in Aesthetic theory, Bosanquet discuses ugliness censoriously. Bosanquet thought during a concrete and causal process, pure negation does not exist. He finds that some ’ugliness’ and beauty can be in dialectical unity, and some can not. However, he opposes Schopenhauerian opinion, and can not believes that ugliness is an imperfect representation of will. After discussion, the conclusion of Bosanquet is that some invincible ugliness is discarded from true aesthetics and only exists in ’the region of necessarily and affected art’. Besides, some ’apparent ugliness’ can be appreciated by strong feelings and will become some advanced beauty.更多还原