盗窃罪司法认定中若干疑难问题研究

【作者】 张楚涛；

【导师】 汪明亮；

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 ， 法律， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 盗窃罪是侵犯财产性的犯罪,历来是刑事打击的重点,一直备受刑法界的关注,不仅是有着悠久的历史,而且具有破坏性、多发性、复杂性。在理论和司法实践中也产生了很多的争议,笔者通过对国内外刑法理论界有关观点的介绍,并在借鉴前人研究成果的基础上,研究盗窃罪在司法认定中若干疑难问题,从而得出笔者对该问题的见解。本文共分为四个部分,主要内容如下:第一部分:盗窃罪的犯罪对象。笔者简要介绍了中外盗窃罪犯罪对象的各种理论,并对各种学说观点进行评析,在结合我国的现国情和历史传统的情况下,提出了本人认为盗窃罪的犯罪对象应当具有的基本特征,并对司法实践中疑难犯罪对象的认定进行了阐述,比如盗窃无形财产的问题、盗窃信用卡的问题、盗窃违禁品的问题。第二部分:盗窃罪的既遂与未遂。笔者先简要介绍了犯罪既遂与未遂的标准,接着进一步简要介绍了中外关于盗窃罪既未遂的各种学说,并对各种学说进行了评析。接着笔者对以失控制说作为判断盗窃罪既未遂一般标准的合理性进行了分析,并结合司法实践,阐述了在司法实践中影响既遂与未遂的其他因素,论述了盗窃数额与盗窃罪既遂、未遂的关系。第三部分:盗窃罪的认识错误。笔者先简要介绍盗窃罪认识错误的概念,接着介绍盗窃罪认识错误的种类,进而从法律上的认识错误和事实上的认识错误进行论述,并结合司法实践,阐述笔者的观点。第四部分:盗窃罪与相关犯罪的界限。盗窃罪与相关犯罪比较容易混淆是司法实践一个比较常见的问题,从而在司法实践中带来比较大的争议,主要有侵占罪、抢夺罪、诈骗罪、故意毁坏财物罪、抢劫罪等,他们之间既有相同点,也存在本质的区别,在具体论述他们之间界限时,本文根据司法实践中可能比较容易混淆的地方,提出笔者自己的观点,并作有较为充分的论证。更多还原

【Abstract】 Theft is a violation of property crime, it has always been the focus of the fight against the criminal, criminal law has been of such concern is not only a long history, but also damaging, with multiple, complex. In theory and practice of Justice , it also has a lot of controversy, through the criminal theoretical field at home and abroad related to the point of view, and learn from predecessors on the basis of research results, author study some difficult problems in the administration of justice of theft , from which the author have opinions on the issue.This article is divided into four parts, main contents are as follows:PartⅠ: the crimal target of theft. I briefly introduce theories of the crimal target of theft from Chinese and foreign countries, and analyze various theorical opinons, combined with Chinese national conditions and historical traditions, I propose that what the basic characteristics of the crimal target of theft should have and explain the identity of difficult crime target in justice practices, such as stealing intangible property、credit card and contraband.PartⅡ: Theft of completed and attempted. The author briefly introduces the standard of attempted and completed crime, and then further briefly introduce theories on completed and attempted theft both Chinese and Foreignor’ s. And author evaluate various theories, and then propose opinons on rationality about the out-of-controlling theory as the general standard for judging the theft attempted or not. combined with the practice of justice, author expounds other factors that influence completed and attempted in judicial practice, and discusses the relations between the amount of theft and completed、attempted theft.PartⅢ: cognitional error about theft. The author briefly introduces the concept of cognitional error about theft, and then introduces types of cognitional error about theft, and then dicuss from legal cognitional errors and factual errors. combined with the judicial practice, i explained my own views.PartⅣ: boundaries between theft and theft-related crime. It’ s a common problem that theft and theft-related crime are relatively easy to confuse in judicial practice. so it brings more controversy in judicial practice, such as embezzlement, the crime of plunder, fraud, intentional damage to property, robbery, etc. they not only have the same points, but also have essential differences. When concretely discussing the boundaries between them, according to relatively easy confused points in judicial practice, in this article,I put forward my own views and make a comparative full demonstration.更多还原