【作者】 彭玮婧；

【导师】 凌文辁；

【作者基本信息】 暨南大学 ， 应用心理学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 本研究采用心理学实证研究方法探讨我国法官胜任特征的内容结构及其与相关因素的关系。具体而言,本研究在文献研究、访谈和开放式问卷调查的基础上,收集问卷条目,编制初始问卷,并通过预试和项目分析,对问卷进行修订,形成正式调查问卷。针对回收问卷得来的数据,运用探索性因素分析得到法官胜任特征的四因子结构模型;运用验证性因素分析对模型进行验证。本研究还进一步探讨了法官胜任特征与相关变量的关系,以及法官胜任特征在人口学、组织学变量上的差异。研究结果表明:1.我国法官胜任特征由四个因子构成:职业道德、工作作风、办案能力、和谐意识。本测量具有良好的信度和效度。对测量结果进行共同方法偏差检验,没有发现显著的共同方法偏差。2.法官胜任特征对法官的工作满意度、情绪衰竭、结案率与二审改判、发回重审率具有显著的预测作用,对法官的离职意向不具有显著的预测作用。3.理想承诺在法官胜任特征和法官的工作满意度、离职意向之间具有调节作用,工作价值观在法官胜任特征和法官的工作满意度之间起部分中介作用,在法官胜任特征和法官的离职意向之间不起中介作用。4.法官胜任特征在法官的年龄、教育程度、所担任职务以及法官等级上存在显著差异。更多还原

【Abstract】 This research discussed the structure of judges’ competency and its related focators in China, using positive method of psychology. Especially, based on literature studying, interview and open-questionnaires, we collected scale items which formed the initial scale. We revised the scale through pretest and item analysis, and finally got the formal scale. After giving out questionnaires, we got a four-factor structure of judges’ competency by EFA and we tested the structure by CFA. We also discussed the relationship between judges’ competency and related variables. At last, the influence of demographics was tested on the four factors. The results are as follows:1. Judges’ competency in China is made up of four factors: professional morality, working style, judicial ability and the consciousness of harmony. The reliability and validity of the scale were high enough. The statisitic test result showed that there was not significant common method bias in the measurement.2. Judges’ competency has a positive influence on job satisfaction, emotional exhaustion, terminated rate and the rate of remand for new trial, while doesn’t have a positive influence on turnover intention.3. Ideal commitment has moderate effect on judges’ competency and job satisfaction/turnover intention. Work values has partial mediate effect on judges’ competency and job satisfaction while doesn’t have mediate effect on judges’ competency and turnover intention.4. There are significant differences on the four factors of judges’ competency among ages, education, position and grades.更多还原