节点文献
传统的调适与非农村庄的内源性发展
Accommodation of Tradition and Endogenous Development of a Nonagricultural Village
【作者】 黄蕾;
【导师】 林聚任;
【作者基本信息】 山东大学 , 社会学, 2008, 硕士
【副题名】来自一个鲁中村庄的实地研究
【摘要】 本研究是以山东省中部一个远离城市、缺乏资源优势而实现了非农化的村庄H村为个案的实地研究。通过对H村在改革前后经历的发展历程的分析,探讨村庄主动进取、渐进发展,实现非农化的内在逻辑。我们通过对村民的访谈收集资料,并获取了关于村庄发展历程的文献资料。通过对这些资料的定性分析,我们发现在村庄发展初期,一方面利用村庄内部的地缘关系及社会关系网络,另一方面利用村党委与国家行政体系之间的天然联系获取外部支持。在村庄发展过程中,改革后遗留的集体主义意识形态影响了村庄的发展方向;村党委延续了改革前的强大动员能力,成为村庄发展的主导力量。村庄内部的传统因素也在非农化过程中悄悄地改变着。村民的职业非农化,生产的季节性观念转变为工作的时间观念,村民生活从散漫无序转变为有节奏和条理性。村民的面对面直接交往在减少,业缘人际交往在增多。村庄传统的居家养老模式发生半社会化的转变,养老敬老的传统与之发生了摩擦,但是没有被消减而是得到了加强。村民生活方式和行为方式的改变表明了农民市民化的趋势,但是农民还没有自觉地意识到。最后,我们总结了H村发展的内在逻辑,那就是在内部传统因素与外来现代因素的互动融合中,村庄内部条件不断成熟,村庄主动开发利用村庄内部的有限的资源,实现了内源性发展。我们认为在H村发展中的关键因素是改造原有的集体组织框架,实现了农民的组织化。我们也发现了H村这种农民组织化路径具有封闭性、同质性等自身局限,因此提出要增强其开放性,谋求大市场体系中的专业分工合作。
【Abstract】 This research is a field study about a village locates in the middle of Shandong Province. In the research, the village is called village H. Village H is distant from cities and short of natural resources, however, it turns to be a nonagricultural village. By analyzing the development process of village H, we try to examine how village H to take initiation in developing and become nonagricultural.We collected data by interviewing villagers and acquiring documents about the development of village H. By means of qualitative analysis of these data, we find that in the beginning of development, the village exploited not only the internal contact between village party committee and official administration but also the traditional geographical relationship and social network inside the village itself. In village H’s development, bequeathal collectivistic ideology affects its developing route, and furthermore, village party committee inherits powerful mobilizing abilities and leads the development. Meanwhile, the traditions inner the village transit quietly. Villagers’ professions turn to nonagricultural. Their time sense, life tempo and communication ways also change. The traditional mode of support the aged becomes from familial to semi-socialized. The traditions of supporting and respecting the old are strengthened rather than weakened. These changes indicate the tendency for peasants to citizens.In the end, we summarize the logic of village H’s development. In the interaction between inner traditional factors and outer modern factors, the village takes invitation in exploiting limited interior resources and achieves endogenous development. We consider that the key factor in the development is villagers’ organization which arises from precedent collectivistic organization. We also find this kind of villagers’ organization at a disadvantage of homogeneity and closeness. It should increase openness and participate in division and cooperation of specialized field.