【作者】 邬炼；

【导师】 胡之芳；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 刑罚权的实施关乎个人的财产、人身自由乃至生命等重大权益,因此,国家必须对刑事诉讼立法高度重视,谨慎行事,以保证刑罚权的正确实施。而刑罚权的正确实施必须以发现案件真实为前提,只有发现了案件真实,法官才能在判决时做到不枉不纵。无论是大陆法系还是英美法系的刑事诉讼,莫不将发现案件实体真实作为追求的目标之一。法官庭外调查作为庭审调查的延伸,对发现案件实体真实具有重要意义。但由于我国法官庭外调查的活动区域已经脱离了严格意义上的“法庭”,而且少受程序的规制,暴露出许多不尽人意之处,法官庭外调查的真正作用与意义也没有完全得到实现。因此,对法官庭外调查的深入研究在当前显得犹为迫切。我国法官庭外调查权的根本出路在于诉讼观念的转变,在整体模式方面,应将现行的法官庭外调查程序改造成为真正意义上的诉讼程序。笔者立足于法官庭外调查权体现的两大诉讼价值——实体真实与程序公正——的冲突,对法官庭外调查权存在的必要性及该权力与相关原则的冲突与如何协调进行了分析,并剖析了该权力在我国存在的必要性。然后检视我国法官庭外调查权的立法和司法现状,并对现状进行了评析,将该权力在我国运行的问题进行了全面展现。再从比较法角度对不同诉讼模式下法官庭外调查权的现状作一考察并进行了简要评析,以对我国完善这一权力提供借鉴。最后针对上述问题,就如何完善我国的法官庭外调查权进行了探讨,即通过确立该权力应遵循的理念——“核查原则”、“穷尽原则”、“有利被告原则”,从法官庭外调查权的启动、范围、手段、调查证据的形式及对庭外调查的处理五个方面论证了如何对该权力进行具体的完善,以期让该权力能最大限度的发挥其积极作用。更多还原

【Abstract】 The exertion of crucifixion is relative to personal possession、liberty or even life,so the country must attach importance to the legislation of criminal process to ensure the correct implement of the crucifixion. To discover the case’s reality is the precondition of the correct implement of the crucifixion. Only when discover the case’s reality, can the judge make a verdict justly. The countries which belong to continental law system or Anglo-American law system all take the discovering the case’s reality as one of goals of criminal process. Judge’s power of investigation outside the court is very important for discover the case’s reality. But outside the court, the judge is less subjected to the rules and regulations of the criminal procedure. So getting a deep research into the power of investigation outside the court seems to be urgent at present. Criminal procedure comprises of serious of litigation values, and not simply substantial justice. The fundamental way to perfect it is to change our idea and change the judge’s power of investigation into a power that subjected to criminal procedure. And the proceeding of investigating outside the court should be reconstructed into legal proceeding. First of all, analyze the necessity of judge’s power of investigation outside the court、the conflict between it and interrelated principles and how to assort with them. Second, examine what is this power like at present,and make a comment about it,and introduce the problems of this power. Third, find out the differences between common law and civil law on investigation outside the court with comparing research and analyze the differences simply. At last, reconstruct our procedure of investigation outside of court,and main about the start of this proceeding, the confine of the investigation, the means of the investigation, and the adopt of these proof acquired outside the court.更多还原