【作者】 袁豪；

【导师】 王能东；

【作者基本信息】 武汉理工大学 ， 科技哲学， 2008， 硕士

【摘要】 海德格尔被誉为最伟大、最重要的现代西方哲学家之一。其独特的哲学运思极大地影响甚至改变了现代西方思想,对我们这个文明时代提出了最坚决、最深刻的批判,已经在不仅是哲学还包括其他众多人类文化领域中留下了鲜明的印记,并且必将继续产生更加广阔而深远的影响。可以说,海德格尔研究已经成为我们时代的思想景观。众所周知,海德格尔哲学中的根本问题是对存在本身的研究和追问。在他看来,由柏拉图和亚里士多德为之思殚力竭而创立的形而上学,建基于思维与存在、主体与客体二分之上,把存在与存在者混淆了,且一直持续到了两千多年后的黑格尔哲学中,并以更加确定、现实的主体性原则体现出来。他认为正是这种传统或近代以来的形而上学桎梏,导致了我们所处时代的严重危机,而要获得从根基上揭示此危机的可能,惟有恢复对存在的本真认识。海德格尔的技术之思作为其存在之思的一个重要组成部分而与海氏本人的哲学运思一样,有着必然的发展进程。海德格尔技术之思具有整体性特点,它以存在和本质为理论起点,可分为四个依次递进的层次:第一,上手之物通达此在;第二,技术是确信之为表象的自我表象;第三,现代技术的本质乃是集置;第四,集置是本有的先行形式。只有通过层层解析从而揭示出海氏技术之思内在的逻辑规律,展现出其海氏技术之思的本真含义,我们才能理解他那异于常人之论——“唯物主义的本质隐藏在技术的本质中”、“只还有一个上帝能救渡我们”、“从马克思主义出发,技术之本质就不可能被理解”等。事实上,海德格尔与马克思一样,都对黑格尔哲学进行了扬弃,只是他们的路径不一样。这也是他们对各自时代中所出现的包括技术在内的种种令人担忧的问题的解读的方式既有相通之处又有明显差异的根本所在。也只有这样,我们才能通过与马克思技术哲学思想的观照,发掘出海德格尔技术之思中的合理成分,并折射出其不可避免的局限性。更多还原

【Abstract】 Heidegger is honored as one of the most important and greatest philosophers of Contemporary Western Philosophy. His unique philosophical thought has greatly influenced or even changed contemporary western thoughts. And it gives the most resolute and most profound critisizms on our civilized society. His thoughts left the distinctive imprints on not only philosophy but also many other areas of human culture and will certainly continue to have a more broader and far-reaching influence. It can be said that the study of Heidegger has become an idealogical landscape of our times.As we all know ,the foundmental problem of Heidgger’s philosophy is to research and question the essence of being. In his opinion,metaphysics which was established by Plato and Aristotle who exhausted their whole wisdom was based on the separation between thinking and being or subject and object. So it confused being with be-ing and lasted more than 2000 years then even sustained in Hegel’s philosophy,shown by the more ascertainable and subjective principles. He believes that this is the shackle of our traditional or modern metaphysics which led to the serious crisis of our present time and if we want to gain the possibility of revealing the crisis ,we must restore our understanding of the truth of being.As a part of his philosophical thought of being , Heidegger’s thought of technology has its necessity of developing course, just like Heidegger’s whole philosophy thinking. Heidegger’s thought of technology has integrity characteristic and it starts with being and essence which are regarded as the foundment of the thought. Heidegger’s thought of technology can be divided into four levels progressively one by one:first,the handy things can get to Dasein;second,technology is regarded as the self-representation of representation;three,the essence of modern technology society is enframing (Gestell) ;four,enframing(Gestell) is the previous pattern of Ereignis. Only having discovered the inside logic regulations of his thought of technology can we master his strange saying "The essence of materialism is hidden in the essence of technology;four,enframing(Gestell) is the previous pattern of Ereignis. "There is only one God can save us" and "From the Marxism, the essence can never be understood". In fact just like Marx, Heidegger also sublated Hegel’s philosophy although they two went in different ways. Those are the essencial reasons why there are not only some conections but also some great distinctions between Heidegger’s and Mark’s thinking of their own time’s various terrible problems which includes technology issues. Only for thus the reasonable ingredients of Heidegger’s thought of technology can be found out and show what is inevitably limited in it ,which is through the comparison with Marx’s philosophical thought of technology..更多还原