【作者】 陈宇；

【导师】 张觉文；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 行政管理， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 乡村治理是一个历史性的主题，特别是在当前我国倾力解决三农问题，建设社会主义新农村的时代背景下，如何应对日益复杂的乡村社会局势，探索出一个能实现善治目标的乡村治理新模式成为全社会关注的话题。“国家—社会”的二元相对模式是各种乡村治理理论研究中的主流范式。笔者主张一种超越“国家—社会”范式的新思维，把“第三条道路”的理论基点放在国家权力与社会权力的临界机制上。结合中国乡村政治制度的安排和历史的路径依赖因素，本文认为在我国的乡村治理当中实行“第三条道路”的关键就是：怎样的“模式”可以尽可能地消除国家权力治理和社会权力治理各自的弊端，使其在我国的乡村治理中发挥积极的、可行的作用?本文把这种作用模式概括为：国家权力主导+社会权力自主的协同治理模式。本文分为五个部分。第一部分，本文对我国乡村治理格局的历史进行了梳理，探讨了乡村治理历史的路径依赖以及现实国情问题。第二部分，本文对国家与社会关系理论下我国乡村治理中的国家权力与社会权力调整问题进行了概括，并设想了这两种权力在我国乡村治理中的调整趋势。第三部分，本文对我国国家权力体系治理下的乡村治理现状与问题进行了探讨，指出国家权力主体在乡村的治理中存在着治理失范与政府失效的问题。这种国家权力治理的弊端与缺失使得社会权力的参与共治成为了必要。第四部分、本文对我国社会权力体系参与乡村治理的现状与问题进行了探讨，指出，由于存在着乡村社会组织先天性发育不良以及受当前社会转型时期的制度环境限制，我国的乡村权力主体也存在着自治失范与自治失效的问题。要解决这些社会权力治理的弊端与缺失，需要国家权力发挥主导以及对其规范的作用。第五部分、本文对国家权力与社会权力在我国的乡村治理中如何走向协同的问题进行了探讨，并提出了两种权力体系下的我国乡村治理制度架构。本文认为，简单的国家权力和社会权力的“两分法"不能解决中国乡村社会的问题。只有在对这两种权力体系下的治理现状、不足以及潜在的问题加以客观的分析，找出这两种权力在我国乡村治理中可能存在的互补和相互制衡的一面，建立起两种权力协同治理的乡村治理新模式，才能达到善治的目标。更多还原

【Abstract】 Rural ’s countryside governance is a historical theme, especially with the historical background of three rural issues are being hardly resolved , and of new socialist countryside areas are being constructed in our country, how to deal with the continuing complex countryside situation ,and to find out a new model of realizing the goal of goodgovernance become the topics that call all attention from the society . "State - society" two contradictive model is the domain paradigm in the different kinds of countryside governance theory .The author claims a new thinking; beyond the paradigm of "state - society" ,which "the third road" theoretical basic points are located in the system of collaborative power of state and social power .This article discusses the key point of the third road that can be conducted in our rural governance ,combining the arrangement of the Chinese country political system and the path of the history .It is that: what kind of paradigm may avoid the defects between states power governance and social power management, and can make it function well and actively .this article generalize this function as the model that states power plays the domain role and the social power acts the cooperative partThis article will be divided into five parts. The first, this paper will hackle the history of countryside governance situation in our country ,discuss the historical dependence ofcountryside governance, and the current situation of our own . The second, this paper will generalize our country’s adjustment of state power and social power in the theory of state -society ,and assume the trend of it’s adjustment in this state.The third, this article will discuss the current situation and issues in the system of state power countryside governance, and point out the problems of governance’s unfunction and government’s failure. The disadvantage of this kind of model call the participant of social power management. The fourth, this paper will discuss the current situation and the issues in the social power management .It proposes that there are self-management unfunction and failures to social power governor ,because of the green countryside organization and the regulation’s limitation from the social transformational era. To resolve all these disadvantages from the social power governance ,it needs the states power governance’s guiding role and it role of managing .The fifth ,this paper discusses the issues that how the power of state and social power can work collaboratively in our countryside governance, and proposes the frame of this kind of system.This paper holds "the dichotomy method" with simple national power and social power can’t resolve the problem of the Chinese country society. Only at to these two kinds of power systems under of manage the present condition,shortage and latent problem to take into objective analysis, find out these two kinds of powers to exist probably in the our country, the country manage of repair with each other and mutually a side of the check and balance, the establishment is in conjunction with to manage since two kinds of powers of the country manage new mode, then can achieve the goal of good governance更多还原