【作者】 王欣；

【导师】 单秋华；

【作者基本信息】 山东中医药大学 ， 针灸推拿学， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 目的:本研究采用心电图为客观指标,对比观察心包原穴——大陵穴和心包经合穴——曲泽穴对冠心病患者心电图即刻效应影响的差异性,并观察两穴之间的配伍效应,为临床优选腧穴提供实验依据。方法:本研究观察30例冠心病患者,分别针刺大陵穴、曲泽穴及大陵穴和曲泽穴配穴,各组顺序随机安排,全部针刺均在同一患者身上不同时间内进行,两次针刺时间至少间隔5天,分别记录针刺前、针刺后即刻、针刺后15分钟、针刺后30分钟心电图各项指标的变化情况。结果:1.大陵穴组、配伍穴组各自针刺前后比较均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);2.曲泽穴组针刺前后比较没有统计学意义(P>0.05);3.配伍穴组与大陵穴组针刺后比较没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:大陵穴具有改善冠心病患者心肌供血的即刻效应;曲泽穴没有体现出改善冠心病患者心肌供血的即刻效应;曲泽穴配伍大陵穴并没有增强或减弱大陵穴改善冠心病患者心肌供血的即刻效应。更多还原

【Abstract】 Purpose: In application of ECG, observing the diversity between the Da Ling and Qu Ze acupoints instant effects for CHD patients, detecting their cooperativity, to supply an experimental basis for selecting the acupionts in clinic.Method: In observation, 30 CHD cases were randomly divided into three groups, and accordingly treated with three prescriptions: Da Ling; Qu Ze; both Da Ling and Qu Ze. Every patient would be treated with three prescriptions at different time, two acupunctures interval of five days at least.The changes of ECGs were recorded with pro-acupuncturing, the acupuncturing moment, and post-acupuncturing in 15mins, 30mins.Results: Da Ling, Da Ling & Qu Ze acupuncting treatment could obviously improve the blood supply of the hearts; Qu Ze had not improve the blood supply of the hearts; No obvious diversity between Da Ling & Qu Ze treatment compared with Da Ling.Conclusion: Da Ling, Da Ling & Qu Ze had the same effect on improving the blood supply of CHD hearts, but Qu Ze had not the effect. Qu Ze could neither strengthen nor weaken the blood supply of the hearts while acupuncturing Da Ling.更多还原