【作者】 李勇；

【导师】 彭启福；

【作者基本信息】 安徽师范大学 ， 外国哲学， 2007， 硕士

【副题名】在现象学与辩证法之间

【摘要】 哲学诠释学注重真理反对方法,张扬诠释反对认知,然而其理论体系的建构本身却没有逃脱一定方法(特别是现象学和辩证法)的支撑,并且它从某种程度上也给我们提供了一定的方法论基础。哲学诠释学内部本身已蕴涵了方法的思想,但它是本体论意义上的,而非认识论意义上的,我们可以名之为“哲学诠释学之道”。这种主观态度与现实的差异无疑给其带来了多重困境,特别是对其普遍性的要求提出了直接的挑战。鉴于此,当代诸多诠释学研究者在反思、批判的基础进行了融合诠释学视域中的本体论、认识论与方法论以及统一诠释与认知的有效尝试。然而在道德价值领域,因哲学诠释学(特别是在其实现了“实践哲学走向”后)本身以“善”为目的,它不仅是“为己之学”与“为人之学”,更是“为人类之学”,这里不存在什么绝对价值标准,也不需要什么道德律与道德规则,“善”就在于自我理解基础上的“自由选择”和“智慧抉择”。更多还原

【Abstract】 Philosophical hermeneutics attaches much importance to truth but opposites method, and lays stress on interpreting but disparages cognition. However, the construction of its theory system doesn’t get rid of certain methods(especially phenomenology and dialectics), and it has also provided some methodological foundation for us. Philosophical hermeneutics itself contains thoughts about method in ontological sense but not in epistemological sense, which we can name "the way of the philosophical hermeneutics ".But the difference between the subjective attitude and the reality brings multiple plights and especially challenges its universal request. Consequently, based on reflection and critique, many contemporary hermeneutical researchers have carried on effective attempt of the unification of interpreting and cognition as well as the fusion of the ontology, epistemology and methodology. However, in moral value domain, because philosophical hermeneutics (especially after it realized "practical philosophy trend" ) takes "good" as a goal, it is not only " the learning for oneself" and "the learning for others ",but also "the learning for the human beings". There are not any absolute value standards and we don’t need any moral laws or rules. " Good" is "the free choice" and "the wise choice" based on self- understanding.更多还原