【作者】 姚英；

【导师】 李招忠；

【作者基本信息】 暨南大学 ， 行政管理学， 2007， 硕士

【副题名】基于农民工三种特殊维权行为的分析

【摘要】 作为中国现代化过程中出现的特殊群体，农民工一直面临着权利和权益得不到保障的问题。由此农民工开始艰辛的维权之路，并在循正常途径无力解决之下被迫采取自杀讨薪、罢工游行、集体上访这三种特殊维权行为。此类迫不得已的行为扰乱社会秩序、影响社会和谐。因此，有必要分析这三种特殊维权行为，以更好地维护农民工利益、促进社会和谐发展。本文以政治参与理论为指导，从问卷调查和案例比较分析入手，将农民工三种特殊维权行为与非制度化政治参与结合起来分析。首先界定三种特殊维权行为的性质，指出其实质上是农民工非制度化政治参与，进而根据数据统计和调查结果得出农民工非制度化政治参与有持续爆发、扩大的可能性。然后从案例着手探讨农民工非制度化政治参与的成因，指出利益受损是动因，制度低效或失效、公共权力运行失范和农民工教育水平不高、组织化程度低导致制度化渠道维权实效性低则是直接原因，即利益受损——制度化渠道维权失效——非制度化政治参与(特殊维权行为)——利益实现。最后，农民工非制度化政治参与虽是迫不得已，但对社会的影响弊多利少，应发挥政府的主导作用，从转变政府观念、厉行依法行政，建立健全法律制度和提高农民工制度化渠道维权能力三方面着手化解。更多还原

【Abstract】 As the special colony appearing the course of Chinese Modernization, farmer-turned workers have been facing the problem that the right and interests can not be ensured all the time. Farmer-turned workers begin the hard way of safeguarding rights, and are forced to carry out special behaviors for safeguarding rights including suicide for demanding salary, strike and parade, appeal for help after being unable to solve problem in normal way. These behaviors upsets the civil order, influences the social harmoniousness. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze these three kinds of special behavior for safeguarding rights in order to safeguard farmer-turned workers’ interests and promote social harmonious development better.The paper regards the theory of political participation as guidance, proceeds with questionnaire investigation and comparative analysis of the case, combines three farmer-turned workers’ special behaviors for safeguarding rights with non-institutionalized political participation together to analyze and research. At first, define the nature of three kinds of special behaviors for safeguarding rights, point out it is noninstitutionalized political participation in fact, and the non-institutionalized political participation has the possibility of breaking out continuously and extending according to statistical data and investigational result. Then probe the cause of the farmer-turned workers’ non- institutionalized political participation from the case. It is original reason to draw the interests damaged, that the poor efficiency or invalid of system, the lose of public power the low level of both educational and organized degree cause the poor efficiency of safeguarding rights by institutionalized channel is the direct reason. Finally, although the farmer-turned workers’ behaviors is forced, the disadvantages of non-institutionalized political participation on society outweigh the advantages. So it is necessary to give the government’s leading role. Changing government’s idea, strictly enforcing and administering the state according to law, establishing and improving the law and improving the farmer-turned workers’ ability of safeguarding rights by institutionalized channel should be done.更多还原