我国检察官自由裁量权的扩权性改革与制约机制探讨

【作者】 张志远；

【导师】 马春娟；

【作者基本信息】 郑州大学 ， 法律， 2007， 硕士

【摘要】 检察官自由裁量权是关涉检察理论和实务发展的重要概念，渗透于各项检察工作之中，非常有必要对其进行系统地探讨。本文从检察官自由裁量权的概念解析入手，对各国检察官自由裁量权运行机制进行比较研究，并分析了我国检察官自由裁量权的运行现状和其运行中存在的问题，最后，针对这些问题，笔者着重论述了我国检察官自由裁量权的扩张性改革举措及其制约机制的完善。本文除引言外，共分五部分。第一部分，检察官自由裁量权概念解析及其价值评判。主要从检察官自由裁量权的内涵、外延和基本特征三个方面进行概念解析，并从其产生背景着手，对检察官自由裁量权进行价值评判，以论证其存在的必要性。第二部分，检察官自由裁量权运行机制的比较考察。本部分对检察官自由裁量权在各国的行使原则、行使权限、制约机制进行了大概介绍和比较研究，并提出了各国检察官自由裁量权的发展趋势。第三部分，我国检察官自由裁量权运行现状与存在的问题。笔者对我国法律规定的检察官自由裁量权及其制约机制进行了系统梳理，并结合当前我国的改革实践，对其运行现状作了简单评价，在此基础上，笔者归纳出了我国检察官自由裁量权存在的四个方面的主要问题，从而引出了下文关于改革和完善的论述。第四部分，我国检察官自由裁量权的扩权性改革举措。本部分提出了扩大相对不起诉的适用范围、增加暂缓起诉的立法规定、建构污点证人豁免制度及确立有限的辩诉交易权等举措。第五部分，我国检察官自由裁量权制约机制的完善。本部分在前文论述基础上，对不起诉裁量权和公诉变更裁量权制约机制的完善提出了自己的看法。主要有：设立不起诉听证程序、加强对自侦案件不起诉决定的监督等内容。更多还原

【Abstract】 The prosecutor’s discretionary power is very important in prosecution theory and practice.It is very necessary to study the power systematically, because it permeates various prosecution works.The writer defines the prosecutor’s discretionary power, compares the operation mechanism of the power in other countries, analyses the current situation and points out the problems of the operation of the power in our country.To solve these problems,the writer gives some measures to expand and restrict the prosecutor’s discretionary power.Besides preface,the text includes five parts.The first part analyses the definition of the prosecutor’s discretionary power and judges its value.The writer analyses the connotation,extension and basic characteristics of the prosecutor’s discretionary power,judges its value from its causing background and discusses the necessity of its existence.The second part compares the operation mechanism of the prosecutor’s discretionary power in other countries.This part first introduces the principles, limitation of power and supervision mechanism of prosecutor’s discretionary power operated in other countries, then points out its developing trend.The third part analyses the current situation and existing problems of prosecutor’s discretionary power in our country.The writer systematically introduces its limitation and supervision mechanism prescripted in the law and simplely evaluates its current operating situation.On this foundation,the writer summarizes four main existing problems of the prosecutor’s discretionary power in our country.The fourth part is reforming measures to expand the prosecutor’s discretionary power in our country. This part suggests measures of expanding the scope of relative non-prosecution, making law on reprieve of prosecution,constructing exemption system of blemish witness and establishing limited right of plea bargaining.The fifth part is perfection of the supervision mechanism of the prosecutor’s discretionary power in our country. On the base of the preceding discussion, the writer puts forward his view of perfecting restrictive measures of discretionary power of the non-prosecution and changing prosecution such as establishing procedure of hearing of non-prosecution and strengthening supervision of the decision of non-prosecution which is investigated by Prosecution,etc.更多还原