【作者】 谢超；

【导师】 何丽新；

【作者基本信息】 厦门大学 ， 法律， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 市场经济的主要内容是商品交换,而商品交换大都是通过合同这一形式来完成的。市场主体之所以选择合同这一形式就在于法律赋予合同以强制执行的效力。合同的有效、无效不仅仅涉及到当事人双方的利益,更会影响到整个社会财富的流转。那么法律是如何赋予合同以相应效力的?合同效力的法律规制机制是什么?这是本文所要讨论的主要问题。本文除引言与结语外共分四章:第一章为合同效力法律规制概述。第一节先给出合同效力法律规制的定义,随后分析了合同效力法律规制的两个阶段──法律对合同的评价与法律对合同效力的设置之间的关系,最后分析了合同效力法律规制的特征。第二节通过对与合同效力法律规制相关概念的界定,形成对本文所讨论的合同效力的法律规制的完整理解。第二章介绍合同效力法律规制的第一个阶段──法律对合同的评价。首先,通过引用法国学者对合同效力的分类标准所做的比喻,笔者对法律评价合同的过程进行了形象的阐释,然后根据法律对合同的评价态度,将合同分为得到法律肯定性评价的合同与遭到法律否定性评价的合同两类,并将这两类合同分别称为“常态”合同与“病态”合同。随后,第一节阐述了法律评价合同的具体标准。第二节根据法律评价合同的具体标准,介绍了判定“常态”合同的标准与“病态”合同的各种类型。第三章介绍合同效力法律规制的第二个阶段──法律对合同效力的设置。第一节对法律设置合同效力的价值取向进行阐述。第二节阐述了法律对“常态”合同效力设置的具体情形。第三节阐述了法律对“病态”合同效力设置的具体情形。第四章对我国法律在对合同效力规制上的不足进行了分析并提出了相应的完善意见。第一节分析了我国法律对“常态”合同效力规制上存在的不足并提出了完善意见;第二节分析了我国法律对“病态”合同效力规制上存在的不足并提出了完善意见。更多还原

【Abstract】 The main content of the market economy is commodities exchange and the exchange is mainly completed through contract. The reason why contract is chosen as a dealing form by market participants is that contract is vested with the enforceable validity by law. That whether the contract is valid or invalid not only involves the interests of both contracting parties, but also influences the circulation of entire social wealth. Then how contract is vested with validity by law? What is the mechanism of legal regulation of validity of contract? This is the main problem that the thesis wants to discuss.The thesis is divided into four chapters apart from the preface and the conclusion:The first chapter is an outline of the legal regulation of the validity of contract. The first section firstly defines the legal regulation of validity of contract and analyzes the relation between the legal evaluation on the contract and the legal setting of validity of contract which are the two stage of the legal regulation of the validity of contract. Finally it analyzes the characteristics of the legal regulation of validity of contract. The second section, through analyzing the relevant concepts about the legal regulation of validity of contract, forms the comprehensive understanding of the legal regulation of validity of contract discussed by the thesis.The second chapter introduces the first stage of legal regulation of validity of contract——the legal evaluation on contract. At the beginning, with an analogy raised by French scholar about the standard of classification of validity of contract, the author firstly elaborates the process of legal evaluation on contract and divides the contract into two types according to the attitude of legal evaluation on contract——one type is named“normal”contract which is positively evaluated by law and the other type is named“morbid”contract which is negatively evaluated by law. The first section explicates the specific criteria of legal evaluation on contract. The second section, on the basis of the specific criteria of legal evaluation on contract , introduces how to differentiate the“normal”contract and various types of“morbid”contract.The third chapter introduces the second stage of legal regulation of validity ofcontract──the legal setting of validity of contract. The first section expounds the value orientations of the legal setting of validity of contract. The second section elaborates the details about how the law sets the validity to“normal”contract. The third section elaborates the details about how the law sets the validity to“morbid”contract.The fourth chapter analyzes the defects of legal regulation of validity of contract in China and puts forward relevant suggestions for improvements. The first section mainly analyzes the defects of legal regulation of validity of“normal”contract and puts forward the suggestions for improvements. The second section analyzes the defects of legal regulation of validity of“morbid”contract and puts forward the suggestions for improvements.更多还原