【作者】 陆露；

【导师】 周显志；

【作者基本信息】 暨南大学 ， 经济法， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 隐名合伙是合伙的一种特殊表现形式，已在大陆法系国家中有着悠久的历史。其最早发源于阿拉伯人，在中世纪形成了康曼达(commenda)契约。之后，大陆法系国家和地区如德国、法国、日本和我国台湾地区都相继确立了这种制度的法律地位。并以其合伙形式的灵活性、关系的稳定性、责任的混合型、应用的广泛性适应了投资者的不同需求，对这些国家的经济发展起到了促进作用。在现代，即使公司形式突飞猛进的发展，隐名合伙仍然没有衰落，并且占有重要的一席之地。成为适应中小企业发展的有效融资手段。反观我国，社会生活中虽实际存在大量隐名合伙，但至今仍法律缺位。严重影响了司法统一性和权威性。本文通过比较研究方法，系统分析隐名合伙存在的必要性以及移植的可行性，应当怎样将其纳入法制轨道。本文共分为三个部分： 第一章为隐名合伙的发展以及现状考察。研究任何一项制度，都不能割断它的历史联系。这一章首先将隐名合伙的历史发展分为两个阶段：中世纪的萌芽阶段；即近代的隐名合伙；以及现代的隐名合伙。其后分析隐名合伙的经济和法律价值。这是我国之所以要建立隐名合伙制度的铺挚。最后，为了厘清概念，将隐名合伙同目前盛行的几种类似制度——普通合伙、有限合伙、临时合伙进行比较。 第二章为各国隐名合伙制度比较。这一部分运用了比较分析的方法。笔者本着借鉴的目的，首先深入比较了大陆法系隐名合伙立法体例；其次，对隐名合伙的根本问题——概念和性质进行了对比；最后是隐名合伙的一些具体制度比较：例如成立制度、出资制度等。该部分是为第三部分打下基础的。 第三章是本文的核心部分。分两段，第一段介绍我国现有隐名合伙法律缺位的情形，并且反驳了一些学者持现行法律中有两处有所体现的观点；之后对在我国建立隐名合伙制度的可行性作了充分的论证。还对一些学者声称的隐名合伙的不利因素及对策进行了探讨。第二段紧紧照应第二部分他国制度，提出我国隐名合伙法律制度的建议。首先，提出结合我国具体的法律传统、相关法律制度几个因素论证出在我国建立隐名合伙制度的最佳模式；其次，我国的隐名合伙应采取何种概念，定位为何种性质，笔者提出了自己的见解。第三，提出隐名合伙的成立，主体人制度。详细地阐述了隐名合伙主体这一争论纷繁芜杂的问题，鲜明地提出了自然人包括部分无民事行为能力人、法人及部分非法人也可作为隐名合伙更多还原

【Abstract】 Dormant partnership, which is a special pattern of partnership, has a long history in civil law system. At first, it is derived from Arab, and came to Commenda contract in the middle ages of Europe. Then, the countries or areas of civil law system, such as Germany, France, Japan and TaiWan of our country established this system and radicate its juridical status. Dormant partnership has a feature of flexibility in form, stability in cooperative relationship, mixed character in cooperative responsibility and wide using, fits varied demands of investors, and accelerate the economy developing in these countries from it came into being. Even though the company system has developed rapidly nowadays, dormant partnership is not out of decline, on the contrary, it has a important position and become a kind pf means of available financing by minor corporations. But in our country, actually, there Exist a great deal of relations of dormant partnership, but they are still confronted in the justice practice, and there are lack of relative regulations, too. This article using comparative research to analyse the importance and feasibility of transplantation of dormant partnership. Trying to reveal how to establish dormant partnership legislative systems concerning reality of our country.Three chapters are organized in this article.The first chapter is an outline of dormant partnership’ s history and actuality. To study a system, we can’ t chop up it’ s history relationship. This chapter divide the history of dormant partnership to two different period: the first is recent dormant partnership, the second is modern dormant partnership. After that we use economic angle analysis conceals an identity the value which a dormant partnership has. This part is in order to say the reason that we shall establish a dormant partnership system in our country. Finally, for clear off the concept, to compare更多还原