【作者】 何庚檑；

【导师】 吴小英；

【作者基本信息】 广西大学 ， 民商法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 本文认为，生育权是一项基本的人身权利，作为基本权利的生育权进入民法领域，它属于人格权的范畴。生育权是一项人格权，则意味着生育权的主体是所有的个人，而不是具有特定身份的人。人人享有生育权，但并不意味着人人都能够实现生育权，任何人要实现生育权，都需要具备一定的条件，这条件既包括法律直接或间接规定的条件，也包括各种非法律的条件。国家法律对实现生育权设定各种条件，应当合乎理性。本文从未婚者实现生育权、死刑犯实现生育权及夫妻实现生育权等方面，阐述法律对生育权限制的程度及其合理性。 本文驳斥认为生育权能中有所谓的生育请求权的说法，认为这是一种严重的逻辑错误，不仅使人们不能正确把握生育权的性质，而且使生育权的一个复杂问题更加复杂化。这一问题是，夫妻双方一方想生育而另一方不想生育，由此所产生的冲突，如果按照生育请求权的说法，则该问题属于生育侵权的范畴，然而生育侵权理论根本无法解决该问题，论文对此进行了深入的探讨，提出了自己的看法和解决问题的方案。 本文从人们普遍关注的与生育相关的社会现象和法律问题入手，针对我国法律对生育权规定的不足和人们对生育权理解的混乱现状，以严格区分生育权的享有和生育权的实现为逻辑线索，对生育权主要纷争问题提出了自己看法和解决方案。更多还原

【Abstract】 The thesis views that the Right to Birth is a basic personal right, and it belongs to the Right to Personality category in the field of civil law as a basic right. That the Right to Birth is a Right of Personality means the subjects of the Right to Birth are all persons, not persons who have certain identities. Everyone has the right to birth, which does not mean everyone can realize it. Anyone who wants to realize the Right to Birth must live up to some certain conditions stipulated directly or indirectly by laws and even non-law conditions. When national laws set all conditions for the realization of the Right to Birth, the conditions should be rational. Thus, this thesis specializes in expounding to what extent the law limits the Right to Birth and its reasonability in the realization of the Right to Birth by the unmarried, condemned criminals and husband and wifeThe thesis refutes the view that there is so-called the Right to Request in the powers and functions of the Right to Birth and argues that it is a very shallow but serious logic mistake. As a result, one cannot grasp correctly the nature of the Right to Birth; even worse, it makes a complex problem become even more complicated. The question is that when the disagreement arises between husband更多还原