【作者】 陈辉；

【导师】 王开元；

【作者基本信息】 新疆大学 ， 文艺学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 作为中唐“古文运动”的主将之一,柳宗元除了卓有成绩的古文创作之外,在古文理论方面亦有自己的独特见解。这些见解也许不如韩愈的系统、全面,但却有相当的思辨水平和思维深度,且在一些问题上有一定的创新与突破。本论文试图对其古文理论进行较为深入的探讨,以理清其脉络与内涵。本论文的论述拟由四部分构成。第一部分介绍柳宗元所“明”之“道”。“安史之乱”之后,民生凋敝,柳宗元自幼目睹身受,待长成之时正逢“新春秋”学派大盛,此派贬《左传》,推《公》、《谷》,由经解传,不重事实参证和章句斟酌,着意于自我见解,旨在有补于世。柳宗元受其熏染甚深,由此形成自己的“大中之道”。柳宗元的“大中之道”强调以“生人为意”,“辅时及物”。(柳宗元的思想虽以儒家为主,但兼收百家,且试图“统合儒释”,因此其文论也相对复杂。)第二部分阐述柳宗元论文。柳宗元作为“古文运动”的主将之一,和韩愈一起倡导“文以明道”。因此在这部分首先对“古文运动”作了简述。对柳宗元而言,此“道”即“大中之道”,也可说他的“大中之道”在文学方面的体现。在“明道”观思想的指引下,柳宗元对古文理论进行了深入地思考。以文求道,明以出之,仍是意在有补世事。柳宗元还提出了“文有二道”说(此处的“道”指的是类别),区分诗文的差别,为其他古文家所无有。第三部分阐述柳宗元对文学的一些具体问题的看法。“文以明道”作为“古文运动”的口号,是符合当时社会改革需要的,因为中唐的这场文风文体的改革运动与中唐士人渴望中兴,复古儒道的愿望紧紧相连。从文学发展的趋势来看也是符合其规律的,因为当时的骈文已日趋简洁,这反映了文风的变化。只是在这样功利性文学观的指导下,论文容易陷于僵化,唐初前贤的例子就说明了这一点。因此柳宗元与韩愈一样,在讨论古文理论时,从文更多还原

【Abstract】 As one of the great master of“the ancient prose movement”, apart from the outstanding creation of prose, Liu Zong-yuan also has his own unique insight in ancient chinese prose theory. Maybe these views are not as systematic as HanYu’s, but they are the thoughts with depth and high level, and there are some originality and breakthrough on certain problems. So the thesis tries to do study on his ancient prose theroy, in order to clarify its train and deep meanings.The thesis consists of four parts.The first part tries to introduce LiuZong-yuan’s“Tao”. After“the Revolt of An and Shi”, LiuZong-yuan witnessed the suffering of people in his childhood, so he received the thought of school“the new Spring and Autumn Annals”when he was an adult. The school devaluates“Zhuo Zhuan”, commends“GongYang Zhuan”and“Gu Giang Zhuan”, and tries to explain“Zhuan”from the Confucianism classics. They do not take the facts and exposition seriously, but attache importance to their own explanation, intend to give impact on the reality. Based on these, LiuZong-yuan forms his“Tao of DaZhong”. LiuZong-yuan’s“Tao”values people’s willing, also tries to contact realistic existence. ( The main part of LiuZong-yuan’s thought is Confucianism,but it mixes the Buddhism and the individual theory, so his ancient prose theory is also complex.) LiuZong-yuan proposes“article can interpret Tao”, besides this, the“Tao”also means the feather of poem and articles, so LiuZong-yuan sees the difference between poem and article clearly.The second part introduces LiuZong-yuan’s view of prose.“article can interpret Tao”as the slogan of“the ancient prose movement”fits for the reform of society at that time, because the movement connectes with the intellectuals’desire closely, who want to revitalize the Tang empire and revive Confucianism.更多还原