【作者】 冯波；

【导师】 李韧夫；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 刑法学， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 错误问题,特别是事实错误问题是刑法中一个重要而复杂的问题。在我国,理论界对该问题中的诸多内容存在争议,实务部门在现行刑法典中也遍寻不到关于错误问题的专门规定,这种现实状况不利于刑法中错误问题的合理解决。本文的逻辑思路在于通过阐明错误问题的基本理论,明晰错误的概念、特征和理论定位,进而以合理的错误分类为理论平台,重点讨论事实错误问题,并且通过分析比较主要的处理事实错误的理论,力图找到一条在主客观相统一方面结合得更好的路径作为解决事实错误问题的方法,以实现刑事责任的合理配置,维护社会正义和犯罪人的基本人权。文章通过前三部分的论述和分析,在第四部分结合我国刑法理论,提出了处理事实错误问题的基本原则和具体方法。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the criminal law, mistake, a substantial content topic, is not antonymous with correctness, but refers to the inconsistency of subjectivity and objectivity. Mistake“not only affects the mens rea and the criminal responsibility, but also involves the attempted offense and the accomplished offense.”Mistake of fact, owing to its complexity and diversity, proves a worth-investigated topic for studying the issue of mistake, and therefore arises a wide range of controversies in the field of laws around such topics as the scope of mistake of fact, the relationship and distinction between various types of mistake of fact, and its principles. This thesis argues that clarifying mistake, especially the basic cognition of mistake of fact functions greatly both in the theory circle and in the judicial practice. The thesis begins with clarifying the fundamental theories in mistake, focuses on the basic arguments in the mistake of fact in attempt to seek a superior way of combining subjectivity and objectivity to be as its principle in order to realize rational use of criminal responsibility, maintain the social justice and defend human rights of criminals.Part one elaborates the basic concept and characteristics of mistake, the definition of mistake theory in criminal law and division of various types of mistake. In researching the issues over mistake, two similar but not the same concepts—mistake and mistake of cognition are used frequently. The accurate definition of a researching object is critical to the foundation of the thesis. By means of analyzing language meaning, usage liability and更多还原