【作者】 王玉强；

【导师】 陈景彦；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 世界史， 2006， 硕士

【摘要】 本文以德川初期的日本朱子学为研究对象,探求日本朱子学所代表的日本儒学,从一种学问体系向一种能与社会作用的社会思想体系的转变,以及在这一转变中所体现出的儒学日本化的独特逻辑和独特规律。本文以为,日本儒学的发展和变迁一方面是因为日本固有的神道体系与日本社会发展进程相比带有滞后性,这样儒学得以以一种工具性质的体系参与日本社会的演进。所以说,尽管日本儒学在学问体系上很难摆脱作为中国儒学的复制品地位,但在日本社会需要下日本儒学有了自己的发展动力,因而其作为一种工具性的社会思想体系的存在才是其本质。另一方面,在儒学日本化的过程中,日本自身思维样式开始其作用,使儒学渐渐地朝着符合日本思维样式的方向变迁。更多还原

【Abstract】 Confucianism was purposefully introduced to Japan during the Yamato period. It can be said that whether early Japanese Confucianism, or Neo-Confucianism of Chu Hsi of Japan which was dominant as the“official school”in Takugawa period, or Japanese ancient school in knowledge systems are unable to break away from China Confucianism’s impact. The article not focuses on the change of the learning system, but on the model of Confucianism’s role in society, especially in Takugawa society. Accordingly, Confucianism is not considered as the learning system, but as the social ideology. Along with such guidance, the author finds that Confucianism worked as the social ideology even when it was introduced to the Yamato state. However it failed to exist as the social ideology, and survived as the learning system and was handed down by few scholars.In Takugawa era, Neo-Confucianism of Chu Hsi of Japan was founded through serving Takugawa society with the theory of Neo-Confucianism of Chu Hsi . It was the time Neo-Confucianism of Chu Hsi of Japan became as the social ideology, not just as the learning system. When it came to Genryoku era, the whole feudal structure began to decline because of commerce’s impact. The feudal structure had to coexist with the business community. Since Neo-Confucianism of Chu Hsi of Japan failed to face the social realities, Japanese ancient school produced. Although Japanese ancient school took some ancient Confucian forms, but Japanese ancient school is not a scholarship school in essence. In fact, Japanese ancient school’s mission was to accept changes in Genryoku period, and attempted to interfere with reality. Thus, despite it emerged as the opposition of Neo-Confucianism of Chu Hsi of Japan, but in fact, Japanese ancient school was to change the lagging of Neo-Confucianism of Chu Hsi of Japan. From this perspective, I think that the Japanese ancient school is the change of Neo-Confucianism of Chu Hsi of Japan in Genryoku period as the social ideology.更多还原