【作者】 汤伟丽；

【导师】 魏建；

【作者基本信息】 山东师范大学 ， 中国现当代文学， 2006， 硕士

【副题名】对一个中国现代文学现象的法律文化阐释

【摘要】 在方法论上,本文是对中国现代文学的法律文化阐释。通过文学与法律的跨学科研究,发掘并阐释了一种富有特色的中国现代文学现象——“无讼”。所谓“无讼”文学现象,是指在中国现代文学的某些文本中,以底层民众为主体的主人公,不将具有“准诉讼”意义的冲突和纠纷诉之于法庭,通过国法解决;而是选择诸如私了,暴力,甚至动用私刑等等非法律手段,或者是仰赖种种具有自治性质的民间组织来解决的一类文学现象。本文对无讼文学现象的阐释,是通过追溯发生原因,在探索“无讼”文学(文化)现象多重根源的基础上,最终探讨其多重客观内蕴。此论述过程始终指向一个中心问题的解决:考察启蒙话语下“无讼”叙事所内涵的“国民性”批判主题之于创作的价值和局限。对于重新理解,评价新文学的“国民性”批判主题,希望这是一个具体、切实的考察渠道,进而希望能为我们重新理解新文学的“启蒙”母题开拓新的视点。正文共分四个部分。绪论部分在对研究方法,研究价值和意义的说明之外,重点解释了“无讼”作为法律文化概念的内涵。传统“无讼”文化现象具有多方面的形成原因,不可能对其下一个简单的价值判断。为了突出“无讼”非意识形态性的独立生成根源,在两个层面上对此概念进行了区分。首先是理想的“无讼”概念。指的是没有冲突和纠纷而不需要法律,或者是将法律搁置不用的一种理想政治﹑社会境界。其次是具体的“无讼”实践。是指,日常生活中本来具有诉讼可能的冲突和磨擦,不是通过专门的司法机关,动用法律以诉讼的形式强制解决,而是以各种各样的非法律形式解决。本文是在结合此两个层面的“无讼”内涵,并在侧重第二个层面的基础上,发掘并阐释现代文学中的“无讼”现象的。大量的“无讼”文学文本表明,中国现代文学所具有的法律感并不是不强烈,文学与法律之间只是以一种更为隐蔽,同时也更为民族化的形式保持着对话。第一部分主要是发掘并凸现启蒙话语中的“无讼”景观。共有三个小节。第一小节叙述据以概括“无讼”文学现象的法律文化语境。中国现代文学缺乏典型更多还原

【Abstract】 In the methodology, this article is one kind of legal cultural explanation to the Chinese modern literature. Through the research between literature and law, I have excavated and explained one kind of rich characteristic Chinese modern literature phenomenon–Non-lawsuit. So-called Non-lawsuit phenomenon of the Chinese modern literature, in certain texts of Chinese modern literature refers to one of the phenomena, which is those people who are the first floor populace result the conflicts and the disputes being lawsuit significance not through the national law, but through all sorts of non-law method, such as settling a matter privately, even using violence and the illegal punishment and so on, or through folk organizations to solve. This article explains it on the foundation of the tracing back varies production of Non-lawsuit phenomenon in the Chinese modern literature, and finally discusses the objectively multiple embodiment of it. This elaborate process aims at a crucial question that is inspecting the value and the limitation of writing brought out by the subject of critique of nationality in the Non-lawsuit narration of the enlightenment words. I hope it is a concrete and a practical channel to re-understand, and furthermore we can get a new viewpoint to reflect that subject.Besides the showing of research technique, research value and significance, Introduction emphasizes on explaining the connotation of Non-lawsuit as traditional legal culture concept. Because it comes from varies foundations, it is impossible to simply evaluate it. In order to give prominence to non-ideological production of Non-lawsuit culture, I have extracted twofold meanings mutually uniting but independent. The first is the ideal Non-lawsuit, and the next is Non-lawsuit as an individual practice in daily life meaning that somebody results the conflicts and the更多还原