法官自由裁量权及其理性控制

【作者】 赵芳；

【导师】 陈金钊；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 在司法领域,从某种意义上说,法治是规则之治与法官之治的双重治理。法律是理性的产物,法律与理性的关系不可分割,理性是自由裁量权制度发展的依托。本文将司法实践理性作为逻辑支点,从自由裁量权的权力配置是理性的价值选择、自由裁量权的公正目标是理性的价值取向、自由裁量权的裁量标准具有理性价值内涵即客观性、自由裁量权的司法过程受到程序的严格制约等方面,分析了自由裁量权的理性内涵。对法官自由裁量权的基本问题做了探讨:包括法官自由裁量权的涵义、特征、价值和范围。在肯定自由裁量权存在的合理性与必要性的前提下,也注意到自由裁量权易被滥用的特点。 由于法官自由裁量权本质上属于公共权力,如果缺乏必要的限制则会导致权力被滥用,从而构成对当事人权利的侵犯和社会秩序的危害。因此,本文在论证了自由裁量权的理性基础上,提出必须对法官自由裁量权进行理性控制。对规范法官自由裁量权提出一些构想:包括立法控制、程序控制、主体控制、交涉控制。与自由裁量权紧密相关,本文强调要进一步发挥法官的自觉能动性,从而更有效地回应社会需求,实现法律的发展。法官的能动性司法在司法实践中客观存在,对其现实可能性和必然性进行思考,也是本文的一个意图。更多还原

【Abstract】 In judicial fields, in some sense, the rule of law consists of the rule of rules and the rule of the judge. The law is the offspring of the reason and which is the basis of development of the system of discretionary power. In this paper I expatiate the meaning of the discretionary power in many ways, as follows: the scheme of discretionary power is the choice of reason;the justice of the goal of discretionary power is the value of reason;the standard of latitude is the objectivity;the discretionary power is restricted by procedure in the course of judicature. In the paper, I discuss the basic problems of discretionary power ,as follows: the meaning of discretionary power, the features 、 the worth and the latitude of it. I not only set forth the rationality and the necessity of the discretionary power, but also notice that the discretionary power is easy to be abused.The discretionary power of the judge belongs to the public power, without necessary restriction it would be abused and that would infringe upon the rights of parties and destroy the social order consequently.Therefore, in the paper , on the basis of argumentation of discretionary power, I put forward that it is necessary to restrict it reasoningly. On the restriction I put forward some designs, including controls of legislation, controls of procedure , controls of principal and controls of negotiation. Close related with the discretionary power, the judge’s conscious activity is emphasized to grant the social demands and realize the development of law. The activity of the judge is the objective being , so thinking deeply about its realistic possibility and inevitability is also an intention of my paper. ( 53000 words of full text approximately)更多还原