创业型领导行为及其与创业绩效的关系研究

【作者】 曲维鹏；

【导师】 王重鸣；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 企业管理， 2006， 硕士

【副题名】青岛创业模式初探

【摘要】 纵观十几年来创业领域的研究,本研究是少数关注创业型领导行为的研究之一。以往的创业研究,尤其在中国,鲜有关于创业型领导行为的实证研究。青岛是中国创业活动较为活跃的地区之一,多年以来“青岛现象”就引起了企业家和学者们的关注,而“青岛现象”最引人注目的就是拥有大批优秀的企业和企业家。作为GLOBE研究的后续研究之一,本研究吸取了GLOBE及其相关研究成果,在以往创业研究的基础上,从创业型领导行为的视角对青岛创业模式进行探索性的研究。本研究对创业型领导行为与创业导向、创业绩效之间的关系进行了深入的分析,并就各个因素之间的相互影响机制做了研究。与此同时,就近年来领导学研究领域新兴的变革型领导、基于价值观的领导和愿景型领导等新型领导理论与本研究关注的创业型领导进行了对比。 本研究通过对以往创业型领导行为及其影响因素研究的回顾与总结,在两轮的企业访谈调研和案例分析研究的基础上进行了实证分析,研究的一手数据都来自于青岛地区的企业。研究主要关注创业型领导行为在企业创业发展(公司创业)过程中,如何通过促进企业提高创业导向,进而影响企业创业绩效。研究试图通过对创业型领导行为、创业导向和创业绩效三者之间关系的研究,在考虑到创业环境动态性缓冲作用的基础上,探求创业型领导行为的内涵及其在创业过程中的作用,并就此对青岛创业模式进行初步的探讨。 研究结果表明,在创业型领导行为上,创业型企业的创业型领导行为显著高于非创业型企业。处于不同市场地位和发展阶段的企业,在不同创业型领导行为上有明显的差异。创业型领导行为对创业导向的“创新导向”和“前摄性”有正向的显著影响,但对“风险倾向”没有显著的影响。创业型领导行为中除“不确定性吸收”、“路径清除”对企业的“成长绩效”有直接影响外,其他创业型领导行为都是通过创业导向的中介作用来实现其对创业绩效的影响。创业导向的“创新导向”和“前摄性”对创业绩效有显著的正向影响,但“风险承担”对创业绩效的影响并不显著。同时,考虑到创业环境的动态性强度,创业型领导行为和创业绩效之间的关系、创业导向和创业绩效之间的关系都受到创业环境动态性缓冲影响。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the entrepreneurship domain in the past ten years, the research is one of the empirical researches on entrepreneurial leadership. In the past researches, entrepreneurial leadership has rarely been discussed yet, especially for Chinese firms. Qingdao is one of the regions in China, where entrepreneurial activities are always prospering, to which the entrepreneurs and the scholars have paid much attention for many years. It is the excellence enterprises and entrepreneurs in Qingdao that attract so much attention. On the basis of GLOBE program, the research attempts to explore the characteristic of Qingdao entrepreneurial activity from the perspective of entrepreneurial leadership and define the entrepreneurial model of Qingdao, by probing the relationships among entrepreneurial leadership (EL), entrepreneurial orientation (EO), entrepreneurial performance (EP). On the other hand, the research also does some comparisons between entrepreneurial leadership, transformational leadership, team-oriented leadership and value-based leadership emerging recently.The research starts with the review of the previous literatures and summarizes the concepts and models of EL. After two groups of interviews and a case study, an empirical research is brought forward on the basis of the firsthand data collected from different types of firms in Qingdao. In the research, the dimensions of EL, and the complicated relationships among EL, EO and EP have been examined. At the same time, the moderating effects of environmental dynamism among the relationships of EL, EO and EP have been paid much attention.The results show that entrepreneurial firms have more EL characteristic than unentrepreneurial firms, and the firms in different market status or developmental stages are different in EL characteristic, but not all significantly. The positive relationship between EL and EO, and the positive relationship between EL and EP are strongly supported. EL only positive affects ’innovation’ and ’proactiveness’ significantly. Except ’absorbing uncertainty’ and ’path-clear’ influencing EP directly, the other factors of EL influence EP indirectly by affecting EO. The relationship between EO and EP is partly supported and only the factors ’innovation’ and ’proactiveness’ have high correlation with EP. The moderating effects of environmental dynamism among the relationships of EL, EO and EP have also been examined.更多还原