【作者】 刘琳；

【导师】 罗志刚；

【作者基本信息】 武汉大学 ， 国际关系， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 两极格局瓦解之后,国际政治表现出明显的无序性特征。在这种情况下,美国的霸权力量日益凸显。美国提出了以进攻性现实主义为理论基础的世界新秩序战略,试图凭借强大的单极力量建立美国霸权下的世界新秩序,其实践方面最突出的表现是伊拉克战争。然而美国的世界新秩序战略却受到各方面的限制,究其原因,美国自身能力有限,而且其对外战略对国际秩序构成严重的威胁,同时不符合国际秩序发展的内在历史逻辑,所以是行不通的。笔者认为,国际制度是未来国际秩序的可能发展方向。 全文共分四章。第一章在分析秩序、国际秩序、世界秩序的概念及其内涵的基础上,认为冷战后世界政治表现出明显的无序性特征。并对冷战后国际政治的无序性特征进行了较为详细的解析,同时也对冷战后日益凸现的美国霸权力量进行了较为全面的论述。综合以上两点,笔者认为冷战后国际政治的总体特点为无序与霸权并存。在这种情况下,美国试图凭借其独一无二的超强实力建立其统治下的国际秩序便有了较为有利的国际环境。第二章剖析了美国试图建立起霸权下国际秩序的战略构想,并从现实主义的角度对美国建立霸权下国际秩序的指导思想进行了较为深入的理论分析,阐明其内在逻辑及理性动机。第三章从政治、经济、军事三个方面对美国建立冷战后国际秩序的实践进行阐述和分析。在政治上美国试图建立其领导的国际安全机制;在经济上建立以美国为中心的全球经济体系;在军事上频频出击,试图建立符合美国价值观与国家利益的国际干预规范;最终将美国霸权从整体上嵌入整个国际秩序中去,以达到维护美国国家利益的目的。第四章,在上述基础上对美国试图建立霸权下国际秩序的努力进行总体的评判,认为由于美国自身实力有限,而且这种霸权下的国际秩序对国际社会的发展与稳定构成了直接的威胁,并直接违背了国际秩序的内在历史逻辑。所以注定是行不通的。笔者认为建立广泛的国际制度是未来合理的国际秩序的可能发展方向。 本文的基本逻辑思路是从建立霸权下国际秩序的客观条件分析入手,探讨这一行为的内在动机、构想,及其实践,并对美国建立霸权下的国际秩序所面临的问题和前景做出评价。更多还原

【Abstract】 After the disintegration of bipolar structure, the international society sank into a disorder state, in which, however, the power of American hegemony came into its full wings. Relying on great power of single polar, America presents a world new order strategy based on the theory of offensive realism, intends to set up an world new order following the lead of American hegemony, and also attempts to put the it into practice. The Iraq war can be considered as an outstanding performance. Nevertheless, America’s postwar international strategy is limited by all the parties concerned. Besides its limited capacity, the strategy is not only a severe threat to the international order, but also disaccord with the inner historical logic of the international order development, for which it is doomed to fail. In the eyes of the writer, international regulation is looked as a possible orientation in development of the future international order.This paper has four charts. The first chart puts forward an understanding aboutoverall feature of the post war international politics------disorder------ after analyzingthe concepts and connotations of order, international order, and world order. This chart also undertook a detailed analysis of post-war international politics disorder, and completely expounded the American hegemony, which became more distinguished in post war period. In summary of these two points, the writer believes that the feature of the post-war international politics is the co-existence of disorder and hegemony. This situation creates a favorable international environment for the U.S to establish an international order under its control, which can serve its state interest. The second chart analyzes the strategy conception of international order ruled by American’s hegemony, and makes a further theoretical analysis of the guidance thought of this international order, explaining its inner logic and rational intention in an aspect to realism. The third chart expounds the practice of the international order in aspects of politics, economy and military affairs. The U.S intends to build an international security system following its lead on politics; a global economical system centered in U. S on economy; and an international intervene standard which meets the American value and the state interests on military affairs by attacking frequently. Therefore, the US could embed itself into the whole international order in order to reach the target of safeguarding the state interests.Based on the above three charts, the fourth chart makes an overall judgment to America’s international order. The writer thought that due to the America’s priority ability and the direct threat to the development and peace of the international society made by this international order as well as the direct violation against the inner historical logic of the international order, America’s international order under the hegemony couldn’t work. Only to build a wide-ranging international system can be the possible orientation of development for the future reasonable international order. The fundamental train of thought of this paper is from analyzing the objectcondition of the international act------building an international order under thehegemony------to its inner motivation and conception, and turn to how it is put intopractice , in the end, giving a judgment and looking forward to its future.更多还原