【作者】 银福成；

【导师】 张树军；

【作者基本信息】 内蒙古大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 控审之间的关系在刑事诉讼法律关系中处于核心地位,控审分离原则是刑事诉讼的基础性原则,是刑事诉讼基本规律的集中体现。现代意义上的控审分离是指在刑事诉讼中作为两大诉讼职能的控诉职能与审判职能在形式上与实质上彻底分开,从而达到保障法官中立、防止追诉权滥用、强化辩护职能和保障被告人权益的目的。目前学者们对该原则在刑事诉讼中的基础性地位已无异议,并且也零星地指出了一些审判阶段存在的控审不分的问题,但缺乏系统性和全面性。本文运用了历史的、比较的和理论联系实际的方法,从研究控审分离原则的历史沿革入手,深刻剖析了其理论内涵和基本要求,最后针对我国刑事诉讼中存在的不足之处,就彻底贯彻该原则提出了五点改革性意见:确立审前司法审查机制,使程序性裁判主体与控诉主体彻底分离;在公诉审查中,由独立于庭审法官的预审法官对公诉进行实体性审查;在一审程序中,对法院变更起诉以及庭外调查的行为给予严格的限制,防止法院在事实上承担追诉职能;在第二审程序中,废除全面审查原则,代之以部分审查方式;取消人民法院主动提起再审程序的权力,或者至少应当取消法院主动提起不利于被告人的再审程序的权力。更多还原

【Abstract】 The relationship between the accusant and the judiciary is vital in the legal relationship of criminal proceedings. The principle of separation between the accusant and the judiciary is one of foundation tenets and the intensive reflection of fundamental law in criminal proceedings. The modernistic principle of separation between the accusant and the judiciary means thorough separation between the accusatorial duty and the judicial duty. It wants to keep neutrality of the judge, prevent misusing of the accusatorial power and strengthen the accused. At present, almost all of the students consider it as a fundamental principle in criminal proceedings and point out some drawbacks in the trial stage of criminal proceedings in China. But that is not systematic and overall. Meanwhile the historical, relative and theory-to-practice methods were used in the article. On base of studying the historical development and analyzing the meaning and main demandsof it, the article come up with many reformatory suggestions for thoroughgoing implementing it according to the drawbacks of criminal proceedings in China: establishing judicial review and letting no-trial judge inspect accusation before the trial, restricting strictly judge’s conduct of changing accusation and inspecting out of court, upbuilding partly investigating system, forbidding judge to initiate retrial which is harmful to the accused.更多还原