网上仲裁初探

【作者】 沈蓉；

【导师】 刘想树；

【作者基本信息】 西南政法大学 ， 国际私法， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 随着网络和电子商务的普及和发展,商事网上争议(Online Dispute)也随之产生。以高科技的电子网络为载体的商事交易,决定了该类争议的当事人通常分属不同的国别,传统诉讼解决机制难以与之匹配。由此,作为替代争议解决方法(ADR)之一的网上争议解决机制(Online Dispute Resolution System)便应运而生。其中,网上仲裁最为理论界和实践者们所瞩目。本文旨在通过对网上仲裁的基本涵义及相关法律问题的分析,试图勾勒出网上仲裁的一个理想模式。同时,对我国网上仲裁的发展方向及模式进行研究,以资实践。 本文分为六个部分,分别论述了网上仲裁的涵义和模式、电子仲裁协议的性质认定及法律适用、网上仲裁的法律适用、网上仲裁裁决的送达、网上仲裁裁决的承认与执行和完善网上仲裁制度的几点建议: 第一部分主要介绍网上仲裁的涵义和模式。电子及网络技术的发展对国际商事仲裁产生了极大冲击,并最终催生了网上仲裁这一新颖的仲裁形式。网上仲裁本身仍处于不断完善的过程,但目前实践中存在的几种网上仲裁模式已较好地适应了其发展需要,并将随着网络技术的进步,逐步满足人们对网络仲裁的需求。 第二部分到第五部分分别讨论了涉及网上仲裁的相关法律问题,即电子仲裁协议的性质认定及法律适用、网上仲裁的法律适用、其裁决及相关文件的送达和网上仲裁裁决的承认与执行,并分别就其进行分析。对电子仲裁协议性质的认定主要围绕无纸化理论,对其效力和相关立法支持展开分析;在网上仲裁的法律适用上主要分析了仲裁程序性和实质性事项的法律适用,并提出相关的解决建议;裁决的送达方面的分析主要集中于电子送达的效力,结合《海牙送达公约》的发展证明了电子送达的可行性,并探讨了如何在实践中合理运用电子送达方式;最后在裁决的承认与执行的问题上,综合上述几个方面,根据《纽约公约》分析网上仲裁裁决可能不被承认与执行的原因,最后还提出了对理想的执行机制的设想。 第六部分是对完善网上仲裁制度的几点建议。网上仲裁是种新兴的争议解决方式,亦是适应网络发展的产物,应该说具有广阔的发展前景。从目前一些国家的实践来看,网络仲裁要为大众所普遍接受还需经历一个完更多还原

【Abstract】 The online disputes have arisen as the popularization and development of the network and the e-commerce. The carrier of the commercial trades based on the hi-tech electric network determines that the parties involved in this kind of disputes belong to different nationalities, which is incompatible with the traditional dispute resolution system. Against this background, as one of the ADR, the online dispute resolution system comes into being. Particularly, the arbitration on line has attracted more attention from the academic field and practitioners. This article, which consists of six parts, aims to outline an ideal pattern of the online arbitration through the analysis of the definition and the legal issues concerned. Meanwhile, the author wishes that the research into the direction and pattern of Chinese online arbitration would have some leading points for future practices.The article consists of six parts, concerning the definition and pattern of the online arbitration, the nature and the law application of the e-arbitration agreement, the law application of the online arbitration, the delivery of the awards, the recognition and enforcement of the awards and suggestions of the refinement of the online arbitration.The first part mainly introduces the definition and the pattern of the online arbitration. The development of the electric and network technology has a great effect on the international commercial arbitration, and hence brought the new pattern of arbitration named online arbitration in to being. The online arbitration is still in the process of self-perfection, however, the existing patterns of the online arbitration have met its development and will satisfy people’ s need with the development of the network.The issues from the second part to the fifth are separately concerned about the nature and the law application of the e-arbitration agreement, the law application of the arbitration, thedelivery of the awards and the documents concerned, the recognition and the enforcement of the awards and the author has also made a deep analysis of the existing problems in the four stages respectively. The determination of the nature of the online arbitration mainly discusses the nature and the legislative support concerned based on the non-paper theory. The law application of the online arbitration mainly concerns the procedure and substantial issues as well as bringing forward some suggestions. The analysis of the delivery is mainly about the effectiveness of the electric delivery and proves the feasibility of the electric delivery and how to make proper use of it in practical field with the development of the Hague Service Convention 1965. In the part of the recognition and enforcement, the author has brought forward some assumptions of the ideal mechanism of the enforcement according to the analyses of the reason why an online awards will not be recognized and enforced in the New York Convention?The sixth part concentrates on the suggestions about refinement of the online arbitration. Which is not only a new way of dispute settlement but a creature suitable for the network tendency and there is no doubt that it will have a broader prospect. The acceptance by the public of the online arbitration will still have a period of development and perfection from the point of practices in some countries; however, it is worth looking forward as a dispute settlement of mainstream. The final part has also out looked the prospect of the online arbitration. There is a lack not only in the practices but also in the academic discussions about the online arbitration in China except the dispute mechanism of the domain name. The author suggests that we could imitate the practical programs mentioned in the first part in order to outline the online arbitration of Chinese style.更多还原