【作者】 滕翠钦；

【导师】 张帆；

【作者基本信息】 福建师范大学 ， 文艺学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 狂欢理论在当下的理论语境中扮演了重要角色。但本文只是对巴赫金关于狂欢节的阐释进行简要的论述,而不是针对他的整个狂欢理论,狂欢节是整个狂欢理论的基础。我要追问的是巴赫金在哪种程度上实现了对中世纪狂欢节的还原?这种还原式的解读隐含了巴赫金的那些叙述策略。所以对于狂欢的分析我更多关注“为什么这么写”。我将陈列巴赫金在建构理论系统之前所规避的有关关联项和对立项(当然这种关联项和对立项也是一定语境之内的意义),力求在更大的系统中完成对巴赫金狂欢式理论的定位。 1、国理论界研究狂欢节的现状;理论家在叙述时不可避免主观的叙述策略。 2、在与其他理论家理论的对比中具体分析巴赫金狂欢节的各个因素(时间、空间、人)。 3、过度语境化导致理论的虚无,但本人并不反对质疑巴赫金(这种态度和指出巴赫金的虚假是两码事),这一章我具体论述了巴赫金理论中的四个悖论。更多还原

【Abstract】 Carnival Theory is having been played an important role in today’s theory context. But in my article, I only focus on Bakhtin’s analysis about carnival, and not the whole theory which depends on carnivalesque. I will head for this question, that is, to some extent, Bakhtin have accomplished recovering from the Mediaeval carnivalesque ? Which narrative-tactics are behind the way on expounding ? So I pay more attention on "how", not "what" about Bakhtin’s Carnival Theory. What’s more, I try to make a boundary in a larger system by displaying all kinds of relationships.The first, sort out the present situation of the study on Bakhtin’s Carnival Theory in Chinese theory field, any theorists will certainly face subjectical narrative- tactics.The second, analyse the factors of the carnival(time\ space\ human) by comparing with the other theorists.The third, ultra-contextation will lead to nothingness. I myself also suspect Bakhtin’s Carnival Theory (it is different from the view on the wrong of Bakhtin’s). At last, I will explain four paradoxes in the Carnival Theory.更多还原