【作者】 符军锋；

【导师】 尤春媛；

【作者基本信息】 山西大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 证据制度是诉讼制度的核心,而证明标准又是证据制度的核心和灵魂。研究证明标准具有重要的理论和实践意义:对当事人举证具有指导意义,也是法官据以确信案件事实得以证明的标准。就行政诉讼而言,证明标准对于司法审查制度的完善具有重要意义。 文章主要分为三章,第一章主要理清证明标准的概念、意义及其与相关概念的区别。其中第一部分在分析了我国现在的各种有关证明标准的概念之后,提出证明标准应当包括主、客观两个方面,这也是本文的创新点之一。第二部分分别从当事人、法官、具体诉讼制度及诉讼成本四个方面来说明研究证明标准的意义。第三部分研究证明标准与证明责任、证明对象的关系,以期进一步加深对证明标准概念的理解。第二章主要对我国现行行政诉讼证明标准进行评析。第一部分在分析法律条文的规定及学者观点基础上总结出我国行政诉讼证明标准是客观真实的证明标准的结论。第二部分分别从证据本质、认识论和司法实践三个方面反思该标准,认为其具有一定的局限性。第三章是全文的重点,在第二章分析反思当前证明标准的基础之上,提出完善我国行政诉讼证明标准的构想。第一部分首先提出确立行政诉讼证明标准应当考虑的因素。第二部分提出行政诉讼证明标准的理念设置——法律真实和自由心证。第三部分从具体行政行为的性质、当事人的举证责任以及诉讼阶段三个角度确立具体的行政诉讼证明标准,即以明显优势证明标准为原则,以优势证据证明标准和排除合理怀疑证明标准为补充。这是本文的第二个创更多还原

【Abstract】 Proof institution is the lore of the system of litigation. Standard of proof is the kernel and soul of the proof institution. So the study about standard of proof plays an important role in the practice and theory. Standard of proof has a constructive significance in posing proof of principal. Judge has a conclusion of certificate confirm the fact of case according to the standard of proof. Standard of proof have an important effect on the complete of the system of judicature investigation as far as administrative litigation concerned.The article includes three chapters. The first chapter is written in order to explain the conception significance of standard of proof, and the difference of concerning conception. The first part of the first chapter confirms that the standard of proof should consist of two factors: objective and subjective, after the author analyses the concerning conception of the standard of proof. It is also one of the new ideas in the essay.The second part shows the significance of researching standard of proof from four respects: principal; judge; the specific system of litigation; cost of litigation. The third part discusses the relation between standard of proof, certification responsibility and certification objection, so that we can have a deep comprehension about the conception of standard of proof.In the second chapter, the author appraises the standard of proof inadministrative litigation of our country nowadays. The first part comes to a conclusion of our country’s objective true standard of proof on the basis of analyzing lawful articles and the opinion of scholars. In the second part the author believes that the standard of proof has definite limitation, after the author considers the standard of proof from three factors: the essence of proof; the justice practice and theory of knowledge.The third chapter is the emphasis of the article. On the base of the second chapter, the author works out the plot of perfecting Chinese standard of proof in administrative litigation. Firstly in the chapter the author determines the factors considered during the course of the standard of proof in administrative litigation. Secondly the author constructs the theory ofstandard of proof in administrative litigation ------lawful truth and free proof.Thirdly, according to the quality of administrative litigation; proof responsibility of prosecutor and defendant, and the course of litigation; the author works out the concrete standard of proof in administrative litigation. It is said that the principle is the obvious advantage standard of proof and the reasonable suspicion. It is the second new idea and the conclusion in the article.The conclusion completes the concerning institution about standard of proof in administrative litigation, for example: improving the quality of judge; having reformation of litigation; adapting the regulation of proof; desalination of judge’s responsibility of collecting the proof during the更多还原