【作者】 罗剑波；

【导师】 李大明；

【作者基本信息】 四川师范大学 ， 中国古代文学， 2005， 硕士

【摘要】 “折衷”是刘勰的主要“论文”方法。《文心雕龙》作为“寡二少双”(谭献《复堂日记》)的划时代文论巨著,其成就的取得,笔者认为,在很大程度上都应得益于刘勰的这种“折衷”思维模式。而就学术界的研究现状来看,关于这一问题的讨论,尚有待于进一步的加强和深化。 本文对于刘勰“折衷”方法的讨论,主要包括以下两个方面的内容:其一、对《文心雕龙》的“折衷”方法从总体上进行必要的探析;其二、以《文心雕龙》《正纬》、《辨骚》两篇为例,对刘勰“折衷”方法的具体运用过程进行分析和论述。 在第一部分中,笔者对《文心雕龙》中的“中(衷)”、“折衷”观念以及刘勰的“折衷”标准进行了具体分析,在此基础上,得出以下结论:刘勰将中国传统文化中的“中(衷)”、“折衷”观念创造性地引入其论文中,从而建立起自己独特的文学批评方法体系;《文心雕龙》的“折衷”方法是以对象的“势”、“理”为依据,以对事物“擘肌分理”的过程为基础,对评价对象进行扬弃、取舍。 在第二部分和第三部分中,笔者集中对《正纬》、《辨骚》两篇“折衷”方法的具体运用模式进行了详尽的分析。笔者认为,刘勰所说的“正纬”、“酌乎纬”、“辨《骚》”、“变乎《骚》”四者,均是运用其“折衷”思维模式得出的结论。这一认识,对于我们进一步探知刘勰的文学思想,以及其置《正纬》、《辨骚》于“文之枢纽”的原本意图,有着极其重要的意义。 在最后一部分中,笔者从训解“博徒”之义入手,对《辨骚》篇“乃《雅》、《颂》之博徒,而词赋之英杰”一句所体现的“折衷”观念,进行了补充说明。更多还原

【Abstract】 "Zhe Zhong" (折衷) is Liu xie’ s main method in reviewing articles. According to the author of the present paper, as an "unmatched" (Tian Xiam FuTangRiJi) epoach-making works, the achievement of Wen Xin Diao Long, to a large extent, lies in Liu’ s special thinking pattern, namely, "Zhe Zhong" . As far as the status quo of the academic circle is concerned, more research work is needed in light of this aspect.This discussion on "Zhe Zhong" centers around two aspects: one is the overall analysis on "Zhe Zhong", the other is about the application of it in Wen Xin Dao Long, taking Zheng Wei ( 《正纬》) and Bian Sao ( 《辨 骚》 ) as two examples.In chapter One, the author gives a thorough analysis on the idea and principles of "Zhong" and "Zhe Zhong" . Based on this analysis, the author concludes that Liu Xie creatively introduces the idea of "Zhong" and "Zhe Zhong" which belong to the traditional culture into the way of article review, hence founds his unique system of reviewing articles. The method of "Zhe Zhong" in Wen Xin Diao Long is based on both the nature ( "势" 、 "理" ) of the objects and the process of analyzing of the objects ("擘肌分理") in question, and finally develop the useful and discard the useless.In Chapter Two and Three, the author mainly makes a completeanalysis on the exertion of the method of "Zhe Zhong" in Zheng Wei and Bian Sao and concludes what Liu Xie calls "Zheng Wei" (正纬), "Zhuo Hu Wei" (酌乎纬), "Bian Sao" (辨骚), "Bian Hu Sao" (变乎骚) are the conclusion drawn from this thinking pattern. This view is of great significance in ascertaining Liu’ s literary thoughts and in knowing his purpose of putting Zheng Wei and Bian Shao into the "Hinge" part in Wen Xin Diao Long .In the last Chapter, by interpreting the meaning of "Bo Tu" (博 徒) , the author gives a further explanation on the application of "Zhe Zhong" in the sentence of " Being ’Bo Tu’ in Ya ( 《雅》 ) and Song(《颂》) yet an expert in writing ode. " According to the author, "Bo Tu" means "rantipoled man" , and Liu Xie uses it to refer to "Chu Ci"(《楚辞》) figuratively by emphasizing the difference between "Chu Ci" and Confucian Classics. In this sense, Liu underlines its changes from Confucian Classics and the far-reaching influence on the literary writing of the later generation.更多还原