【作者】 张艳；

【导师】 左卫民；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 鉴于法学界对纠纷解决的研究已从仅仅关注司法审判的角度扩展到司法审判之外，为回应这一研究趋势，本文将目光投向中国社会中存在的官办社团，希望能从它们参与解决纠纷的过程中，看到另一幅纠纷解决的图景。本文在对官办社团的总体特征及历史变迁进行考察后，将工会作为具有代表性的官办社团，展现它的发展和变迁，并通过具体的个案，分析其如何运用自己的官办资源，采取不同的策略，达到解决纠纷的目标。本文虽较多地描述了工会解决个案纠纷的过程，以此显现官方资源对解决纠纷的作用，但作者更希望能从中体现官办社团解决纠纷的通病，如对官方资源过分依赖，过分注重体制内诸种因素影响等。这些通病导致其在纠纷解决的过程中立场摇摆不定，甚至在关键场合患上失语症。因此，官办社团参与纠纷的解决并不具有普遍性，难以获得普遍的社会认同。而这恰好是官办社团的原罪——官办性带来的。就官办社团而言，离开官办性的支持，又可能毫无作为。官办社团解决纠纷处于上述的两难之中，是由整个时代背景所决定的。因此，官办社团解决纠纷要想成为一种被人们普遍认可的替代性纠纷解决方式，还有待中国社会改革的进一步深化。更多还原

【Abstract】 To react the trend of the law circles’ research on settling dispute from paying inward attention to judicial activity to outward, the text casts sight on official associations in the society of China, and wants to see another sight of settling dispute from official associations’ angle. After observing the official associations’ general character and history, the text chooses labor union as the model of official associations, shows it’s development and changes and analyses how it settles dispute through utilizing its own official resource and taking different measures in concrete cases. To show the role of official resource, more courses of the labor union settling concrete dispute are described, but we, even more, hope these describes can embody official associations’ common fault, for example relying on official resource too much, paying too much attention on various facts inside the system etc., which lead the official association to plays pendulum and even to be suffered from the aphasia in the key occasion during settling the dispute. So official associations’ settling dispute has no universality and hardly obtains the society’s acceptance, but all theseare brought by the official associations’ original sin-official nature. As to officialassociations, they may have no conduct without official nature. Official associations seeming to be in the aforesaid dilemma is determined by the whole era background. So official associations’ settling dispute being to be a kind of ADR (alternate dispute resolution) still expects further reform.更多还原