节点文献

论第三人侵害债权

On the Third Party’s Infringement on the Creditor’s Rights

【作者】 唐北湘

【导师】 彭熙海;

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 , 法律, 2004, 硕士

【摘要】 本文认为,第三人侵害债权是指债的关系以外的第三人故意实施或与债务人恶意通谋实施的旨在妨害债权的实现,使债权人的财产利益遭受损害,并应当承担损害赔偿责任的行为。第三人侵害债权的类型分为直接侵害和间接侵害两种,直接侵害一般有两种形式,一种是第三人处分或行使债权,直接使债权消灭;另一种是因第三人的行为使债权直接受到损害。间接侵害又分为实体侵害、直接引诱、间直接侵害和间间接侵害四种。第三人侵害债权的构成要件包括四个,即故意、行为的违法性、损害和因果关系。第三人侵害债权的法律责任包括三种类型:一是第三人承担单独责任;二是第三人与债务人承担连带责任;三是第三人与债务人承担不真正连带责任。除了包括一般侵权行为所具有的免责事由外,第三人侵害债权还有三种情况可以免责,即正当竞争、履行职责和忠告。 本文同时认为,建立我国第三人侵害债权的法理依据是债权的不可侵理论和公平与效率的法律价值,而其立法依据在宪法和民法上都有所体现。建立我国第三人侵害债权制度的必要性有三个:一是保障债权人利益;二是维护交易安全和秩序;三是保护正当竞争。通过上述分析,笔者认为建立我国第三人侵害债权制度是可行的,并就如何建立我国第三人侵害债权制度作了尝试。

【Abstract】 The paper considers that a third party’s infringement on creditor’s rights refers to a third party beyond debt relationship on purpose or with evil intention implements to make the creditor’s property interests damaged by impairing the realization of creditor’s rights, and is responsible for compensation for damage. The form of a third party’s tort can be classified as direct tort and indirect tort. Direct tort has two kinds of form, one is that a third party punishes or exercises creditor’s rights, and make creditor’s rights eliminated directly, the other is creditor’s rights are damaged directly because of the action of the third party. Indirect tort can be divided into substantial infringement, direct luring, indirect-direct infringement, and indirect-indirect infringement. The important constructive conditions of a third party’s include four, namely intent, action illegality, damage, causality. The legal liability in a third party’s tort include three: First, the third party bears liability alone; Second, the third party and debtor bear joint liability; Third, the third party and the debtor bear untrue joint compensation obligation. Besides includes all causes exempted from liability in the general tort, a third party’s infringement upon creditor’s rights has yet three case which can be exempted from liability, namely justice competition, duty implementation and advice.The paper thinks as well that the jurisprudence basis of establishment of the system of a third party’s tort in our country is the theory of inviolable character of creditor’s rights and legal value basis with fair and efficiency, and its legal basis all reflect, to some extent, on the constitution and civil law. There are three systematic necessities: First, to secure the rights and interests of creditor; Second, to safeguard the security and order of bargain; Third, to protect the justice competition. Through analyzing above-mentioned aspects, I thinkestablishment of the system of a third party’s tort in our country is feasible, and make an attempt on how to establish the system in our country.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 湘潭大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2005年 01期
  • 【分类号】D923
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】648
节点文献中: