【作者】 黄柳；

【导师】 宋世杰；

【作者基本信息】 湘潭大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 公诉权是诉权在刑事诉讼领域的国家权力化,一般包括起诉权、不起诉权和上诉权(我国称之为“抗诉权”)三项内容。公诉权制约则是指对公诉权主体不规范运作公诉权的行为所进行的约束、制衡、监督等活动,以及由此而形成的制度的总称。制约公诉权的必要性可以从权力的扩张性、人权保障、减少犯罪控制成本和公诉权运行的现实需要等四个方面来进行分析;其价值则在于使实体正义、程序公正和诉讼效益这三项公诉价值在刑事诉讼活动中得到正常实现。无论英美法系还是大陆法系都比较重视对公诉权行使的监督与制约,但由于两大法系的历史传统、诉讼制度及诉讼价值取向不同,因而制约的重心及方式均有着明显区别。就我国目前的公诉权制约机制而言,虽也相当完备,但尚存在缺漏之处,这主要表现在:立法对辩护方的制约权规定不够完善;被害方的制约权难以充分实现;检察系统的内部制约存在不足;被害人自诉救济制度存在诸多弊端;公诉审查程序的制约力量薄弱;检察机关自侦案件中不起诉制约的环节过于单薄。完善我国的公诉权制约机制,应遵循法治原则、适度原则、参与原则、程序公开原则和均衡原则。完善的具体构想包括:增强审查起诉活动的公开民主性;明确“检察一体化”原则;完善对不起诉权的事后制约;加强对公诉权行使的司法控制;规范抗诉权的运作。更多还原

【Abstract】 The power of public prosecution is the powerization of the litigious right in the field of criminal process. It includes the power to or not to bring an action and the power to appeal (in our country it’s called “the power to counterappeal). The restriction of the power of public prosecution refers to the activities, including restricting、balancing and supervising over the abnormal way of carrying out the power and the general term of the systems that come into being through these activities. The necessity of the restriction lies in four aspects: the expansion trend of power, safeguarding human rights, cutting down the cost of crime control and the current wants from the operation of the power of public prosecution. The value of the restriction is to achieve the three values of public prosecution in criminal process, which are substantive justice, procedural justice and the beneficial results of suits. Both the Anglo-American law system and the Continental law system pay great attention to the restriction of the power of public prosecution, but the focus and ways are quite different due to their different traditions, different systems and different values. In terms of china’s current restriction system of the power of public prosecution, it is quite good. But many problems still remain: the incomplete legislative rules of the defendant’s restriction right, the difficulties in fully realization of the victim’s restriction right, the disadvantage of the procuratorial organ’s inner restriction, the malpractices of the victim’s self-relieving system, the weakness of the restriction power in the procedure of examining the public prosecution and the weakness of the supervision in cases investigated by procuratorial organ itself. In order to perfect the restriction system of the power of public prosecution, we should follow <WP=5>the principle of rule by law, the principle of moderate degree, the principle of participation, the principle of open procedures and the principle of equation. Specifically, the author’s propositions include: making the prosecution activities opener and more democratic, clarifying the principle of “unitary system of procurator”, improving the aferhand restriction of nonprosecution, strengthening the judicial control over the power of public prosecution, normalizing the operation of the power of counterappeal.更多还原