【作者】 赵俊；

【导师】 韩玉贵；

【作者基本信息】 山东师范大学 ， 马克思主义理论与思想政治教育， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 文化是国际关系研究中的重要研究对象之一，在国际关系研究中，与政治、经济、军事等因素不同，文化深入地渗透到政治、经济、军事等其他因素中。随着国际关系研究的发展，人们不满于单单对政治、经济和军事等所谓“硬”因素的研究，尤其是冷战后，国际关系领域越来越重视文化在国际关系中的重要作用。西方国际关系理论中有影响的新观点往往都是以文化作为切入口。 与此相应，中国的国际关系理论研究也出现了一股文化热。但目前在国际关系领域内的文化研究往往局限于文化在国际关系中的作用、意义与影响这个角度，对文化如何影响国际关系的进程却探讨不多，本论文就是尝试着从“怎么样”这一角度来说明国际关系中的文化因素。论文共分为四个部分： 第一部分：近年来，文化视角是国际关系研究的新宠儿。这并不意味着文化刚刚才作为国际关系研究的视角，但它充分反应了国际关系学者们对已有研究范式的不满和对新的研究范式的探索。第一部分主要讨论了文化在国际关系中的概念和国际关系理论研究范式中的三种文化视角。通过几种“文化”定义的分析，我们可以说国际关系领域里的文化就是以价值观、信念为内核的，影响国家对外行为和对外政策制定执行的观念系统，就是指行为体的互动而形成的集体知识，是一种社会共有的、结构化了的知识，包括规范、惯例、风俗和制度等。并规定了本文的论述范围，本文的主体是论述文化是如何影响国际关系的，而不是单纯地把文化在学理上到底起多大作用的讨论作为理解的重点。接着，本部分叙述性地论述影响较大的亨廷顿的“文明冲突论”、温特的建构主义和日本学者平野健一郎的国际文化理论。 第二部分：在国际关系领域里，对文化的分析必然涉及其内部的层次结构，因而采用国际关系的层次分析方法来阐释文化的静态结构，进而说明文化(知识)与权力的联系、文化与国际关系是如何互动的。这只是一个方面，另一方面便是采用约翰逊的“文化循环论”来论证文化的动态流动，具体包括“文化力”的产生、文化的生产、文本的形成和文化的阅读。对于文化的这种简约分析，虽然并不能涵盖文化全部内容，但对于文化的静态属性和动态作用模式的分析来说具有重要意义。 第三部分：第三部分把文化放在全球的语境下思考，这便让人很容易联想起文化与经济全球化的关系。其实，与经济全球化一样，文化也在全球化。某种程度上的文化流动就是文化全球化，可以说文化全球化已是一个客观的存在，并且日益深刻地影响人类社会的生活。在当今，政治军事这些“硬权力”的争夺已经减弱，文化这样的“软权力”的争夺在文化全球化影响下日益激烈，给各国的外交决策和文化决策带来了新的挑战。对于文化全球化的研究，我们除了要了解“文化全球化”本身外，还要了解该概念的历史传承关系及其对当今国际关系中的影响。本文认为文化全球化就是某种特质文化搭载其载体在全球范围内的流动，并且不断和异质文化互相认识、选择和书诉的过程。这一过程包含着全球文化共识的形成和文化差异性、民族性被日益重视的矛盾统一。 第四部分:根据前三部分的分析，立足于中国的实际，本部分提出了“中国对外战略的文化选择”用语，这里主要是阐明这样的道理:外交决策的选择除了世界形势的外在因素的制约外，还有文化观念的制约。这也就是说，结构与进程的共同制约一个国家的外交决策。并对和平共处五项原则、中日关系、中国与G8、联合国中的中国、911事件与阿富汗战争和中国的国内政治与对外关系等七个方面从文化的角度进行解读。更多还原

【Abstract】 This thesis primarily discusses the culture that has being used as research method and the application of the ontology in international relations theories. The culture is one of the important research objects of the international relations research. In the study of international relations, different from these factors such as the politics, economy and military etc., culture thoroughly permeates the politics, economy, military and other factors. Along with development of international relations study, researchers are dissatisfied with the research of the politics, economy and military, which are called "hard" factors. Particularly after the end of the Cold War, the culture, as a factor that is valued more and more, has played an important role in the international relations realm. Almost all the new and influenceful western international relations theories originated from the culture. With this cowgirl, the Chinese international relations theories research also appeared a culture heat. But current culture study in the international relations realm only focused on the cultural function, meaning and effect. The research that explains how the culture affects the progress of the international relations is much less than the former. My thesis is to try to explain how the culture work in the international relations from the " how" angle. The thesis is divided into totally four parts:The first part: In recent years, the view of culture angle is an investigative and new favorite subject in international relations. This does not mean that culture just begins to be used as a research angle of the international relations research, but it well reflects scholars’ dissatisfaction in the international relations with the former study paradigm and their quest of the new research paradigm. The first part discusses the concept of culture primarily in the international relations and three kinds of view of cultural angle in international relations theories study paradigm. After the analysis of a few culture’s definition, we can say that culture in international relations realm a set of notion system that influence a country’s foreign conduct, making-decision and enforcement of foreign policy, with the core of value view and belief. In other words, the culture is collective knowledge that is formed by the behaviorists’ interaction, and a kind of the knowledge, which is hold by the whole society and is constructed, including norm, customary practice, customs and institution and so on. And this part also limits the scope of this thesis’s research. The textual corpus is to discuss how culture affects the international relations, not purely putting how much function ofculture in the academic theories as the highlight of comprehension. Then, this part descript Samuel P Huntingdon’s ’the theory of civilizational confliction ’, Alexander ?Wendt’s constructism and a Japanese scholar’s international culture theory.The second part: In international relations realm, the research of culture inevitably involves its internal level structure. As a result, it is apt to adopt the level analysis method of international relations to release the cultural stationary construction, then to explain the relations between the culture (knowledge) and the power, to explain the interaction between the culture and international relations. This is just an aspect, on the other hand, this part adopts R?Johnson’s ’culture circulating theory’ to expound and proof the cultural dynamic function mode, including the creation of cultural force, cultural production, the formation of the text and culturally reading. Although this incise analysis of culture cannot cover all cultural contents, it is meaningful to analyze cultural dynamic function mode and the cultural stationary construction.The third part: The third part puts the culture under the consideration of global language context, easily provoking the association of culture and economic globalization. In fact, like economic globalization, the culture is also globalized. A certain the cultural movement is just更多还原