【作者】 吕巧英；

【导师】 李振纲；

【作者基本信息】 河北大学 ， 中国哲学， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 陈确是明清之际的进步思想家。他受学于刘宗周，承绪了儒家传统，却有着个性鲜明的学术思想和独特的学术风格。他对当时民间流行的迷信风水、久丧不葬等社会陋习大加批判，认为这些弊端败坏了世道人心，妨害了生民的生计。他又针对当时空谈义理的学风，写下《大学辨》，从“迹”和“理”两方面辨《大学》非圣经。其目的就是要人们实事求是，从程朱理学的束缚中解脱出来。人性论是陈确思想的重要组成部分。他认为人性首先是一种自然的本能，通过人本身的“气情才”加以体现。人性并非先天固有，也非一成不变，而是后天学习的结果。这相对于理学家在人性论问题上的形而上学观点，无疑具有进步性。 陈确的学术思想是时代内容的反映，具有很强的时代性，他不仅对理学之弊进行了批评，对阳明心学也未附和，对其师说也未固守，走的是一条理性自由的学术道路。更多还原

【Abstract】 Chen Que, the progressive thinker at the end of Ming Dynasty and the beginning of Qing Dynasty. He had distinct individuality thought and academic characters being a Confucianist taught by Liu Zongzhou’s school. He criticized social bad habits that made a fetish of geomantic omen, and thought these evils corrupted morals of the time and impaired the people’s livelihood. And he wrote On Da Xue because the study’s style of empty talk and argued it didn’t the Bible from logic and substance. He did this in order to seek truth from facts and be fettered by a Confucian school of idealist philosophy. The theory of human nature is a important part of Chen Que’s ideas. He considered that human nature was naturally instinct by airs, feeling and talent, and human nature wasn’t innate and immutable, but it was postnatal. Compared with metaphysics of Confucian school of idealist philosophy, the theory was progressive.Chen Que’s academic theory reflected the substance of age. Not only he criticized Confucian school of idealist philosophy’s evils, but also he didn’t chimed in with Wang Yangming’s school of universal mind and didn’t firmly entrenched in his teacher’s theory. He opened up academic road of reason and liberty.更多还原