我国行政程序法模式选择与立法建构

【作者】 高扬；

【导师】 叶美霞；

【作者基本信息】 南京理工大学 ， 马克思主义理论与思想政治教育， 2004， 硕士

【摘要】 本文在马克思主义理论的指导下，运用行政程法理论，研究行政程序法的焦点问题。论文从明确行政程序法的基础理论入手，对行政程序法立法的模式选择与责任机制建构进行了深入、系统的研究，提出了自己的观点和理由。全文共分三个部分： 第一部分为行政程序法的基础理论研究。目前理论界关于行政程序法的有关基础理论仍存在很多争议，这不利于更深入地研究行政程序法。鉴于此，笔者针对争议焦点进行分析与探讨。首先，笔者界定了行政程序的定义，对行政程序与诉讼程序作了比较研究，指出二者的区别与联系，并对行政程序的种类进行了总结；其次，界定了行政程序法的概念、特征、功能，为进一步深入研究行政程序立法搭建了一个理论平台；最后对我国行政程序法立法的发展现状进行了分析研究，阐明了我国行政程序法的观念、立法成果及存在问题。 第二部分为行政程序法的立法模式研究。关于目标模式，笔者首先明确了目标模式的重要意义，并对公正模式与效率模式进行了比较研究，在对影响目标模式选择的因素进行分析的基础上，结合我国国情，提出了中国行政程序法目标模式的选择；关于体例模式，笔者在阐明了体例模式的划分后，对两种体例模式的优缺点进行了分析，并提出中国行政程序法的体例模式和立法步骤；关于制度模式，笔者首先分析了确立基本制度应当考虑的因素，随后提出了我国行政程序法应规定的六项基本制度，并对每一项制度进行了具体分析。 第三部分为行政程序法的法律责任机制建构。笔者首先明确了行政程序违法的概念，其次在分析国外关于行政程序违法法律后果规定的基础上，探讨我国行政程序违法法律责任机制的建构，并提供了具体建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 This paper carries out a deep and systematic study of the legislation model and the liabilities of violating of the Administrative Procedural Law (APL). Three chapters consist of this paper.Chapter one is on the basic theories of APL. First, the author analyzes the definition of administrative procedure, compares administrative procedure with judicial procedure in order to show the similarities and differences between two procedures and summarizes the variety of administrative procedure. Then , the author defines the concepts, characters and functions of APL so as to set up theory terrace for the further study. At last, the author analyses the APL present conditions of China and elucidates the procedure sense, achievements in legislation problems existed in our country.Chapter two is on the choice of mode of APL in China. Section one, aim mode. The author makes the important significance clear and makes comparative research on the mode of individual right and the mode of efficiency. On the basis of analyzing the factors influence the choice of aim mode, the author indicates the aim mode of APL of China.Section two, style mode. There are two style modes of APL-------the law mode and thecode mode. After analyzing the merits and demerits of two modes, the author puts forward the style mode and the legislation procedure of China. Section three, system mode. After analyzing the factors we should consider when we establish the system mode, the author raise six kinds of basic system the APL of China should stipulate and make a concrete analysis of every system.Chapter three is on the liabilities of violating APL. First, the author confirms the concept of the liabilities of violating APL. Second, on the basis of analyzing the external regulation, the author probes into setting up the mechanism of liabilities of violating APL and provides concrete suggestions.更多还原