【作者】 孙燕；

【导师】 陈永革；

【作者基本信息】 四川大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 民事诉讼中的审前准备程序指的是在第一审普通民事诉讼中，从人民法院受理案件以后到开庭审理之前，人民法院、审判人员以及诉讼双方当事人所进行的旨在为开庭审理做准备的一系列诉讼活动的总和。审前准备程序可以说是整个案件进行审理的开端，审前准备程序功能的充分与适当发挥，直接影响着民事审判的公正与效率。从世界各国的发展趋势来看，审前准备程序已经日益成为民事诉讼中的一个非常重要的阶段。文中，笔者对我国民事诉讼有关审理前的准备的历史发展以及两大法系的主要国家的民事诉讼审前准备程序进行了考察，通过对审前准备程序的功能与价值的分析，以及对我国审前准备程序缺失之剖析，旨在寻求一种适宜于我国现状的最佳审前准备程序，并提出了构筑我国民事诉讼审前准备程序的一系列设想，使之能够充分服务于整个民事审判过程，成为民事诉讼的“良好开端”。 全文共分五个部分进行论述。 第一部分首先对审前准备程序的功能和价值进行了阐释，明确了审前准备程序在争点整理、固定证据、约束当事人诉讼行为以及促进纠纷解决等诸多方面的功能，以及反映出的对于保障诉讼公正与效率的价值。 第二部分是对我国民事诉讼的历史回顾，并在其中寻找审前准备的痕迹；而重点又放在对建国以后有关审前准备的历史的考察。回顾历史，了解我国民事诉讼中有关审前准备活动的传统与发展演进的过程，有助于以古鉴今，以旧鉴新，从而成为建构审前准备程序的历史参照，起着不可估量的作用。 第三部分是对两大法系主要国家(美国、德国和法国)审前准备程序的介绍，具体研究其审前准备程序中的各项制度.这些国家的民事诉讼审前准备程序都有着悠久的历史和并已经发展到相对比较完善的程度。本文在这一部分对国外审前准备程序中的各项制度进行考察，旨在吸收借鉴其先进经验和优秀制度，并对其缺陷做出清醒的认识，从而有利于在我国审前准备程序的建构中取其精华，去其糟粕，结合我国国情与现状合理利用其优秀制度。 第四部分回到国内，对我国目前对于民事诉讼审前准备程序的立法与实践中的现状和问题进行了深刻的剖析，寻找造成这些问题的根源，并为解决这些问题做出准备。其中又尤其针对近年来的民事审判方式改革展开评述，包括诸多司法解释的颁布实施及其影响，以及实践中各人民法院的各种改革尝试。这些尝试为建构完整的审前准备程序提供了宝贵的实践经验，在这个过程中，我国审前准备程序的轮廓逐渐清晰。 最后一部分立足于对我国民事诉讼审前准备程序的构筑。在程序独立，诉讼公正和效率的理论基础上，笔者提出了构筑审前准备程序的途径，即对现存的有关审前准备方面的各种制度加以改革和完善，同时在立法上确立审前准备程序的独立地位，并对审前准备程序的进程提出了具体的设想。 综观全文，不难看出，笔者通过纵向的对我国审前准备的历史性考察，横向的对其他国家审前准备程序的细致研究，力图在独立、公正和效率的基础上构筑我国审前准备程序，从而使我国目前各法院有关审前准备的做法相对不统一的局面能够得以结束，而建立起具有独立程序意义的民事诉讼审前准备程序。更多还原

【Abstract】 The pre-trial preparing procedure in civil procedure includes all preparation activities for the trial by the court, judges and parties during the period from the acceptance of a case by the court to the time just before trial. The pre-trial preparing procedure can be said as the beginning of civil procedure, and the full and proper realization of it’s function directly effects justness and efficiency of civil procedure. From the developing direction in the whole world, the pre-trial preparing procedure has already increasingly played a very important part. In this dissertation, by making a deep review of the history of pre-trial preparing procedure in China and the pre-trial preparing procedures in other countries, and a thorough analysis of functions and value of pre-trial preparing procedure and the shortage in China, the author tries to seek a kind of pre-trial preparing procedure which suits the instance in China best.The dissertation consists of five chapters:The first chapter firstly explains the functions and value of pre-trial preparing procedure and expatiates on the various functions of the pre-trial preparing procedure, such as the clear up of issues and evidences, restrictions on the activities by the parties, acceleration of the settlement of the case and so on, and the value reflected by those functions.The second chapter reviews the history of pre-trial preparing procedure in China, which makes a mirror of nowadays procedure and helps build a newpre-trial preparing procedure.The third chapter mainly introduces pre-trial preparing procedures in other countries from both continental and Anglo-American legal system. By researching the specific systems of their pre-trial preparing procedures, the author tries to absorb those advanced experiences and systems, which helps much in building our own pre-trial preparing procedure.The forth chapter makes a profound anatomy of the actuality and abuses of both legislation and practice and searches the roots of those questions. And also in this part, the author makes pertinent comments on the innovation of civil trial methods in recent years.The last chapter is about the construction of an integrated pre-trial preparing procedure in China. On the base of procedure independence, justness and efficiency, the author provides certain method of building pre-trial preparing procedure, that is to innovate and perfect the pre-trial preparing systems in practice and also make use of new systems which are propitious to Chinese.更多还原