【作者】 陆招英；

【导师】 马重奇；

【作者基本信息】 福建师范大学 ， 汉语言文字学， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 《切韵》性质是学者们孜孜不倦研究的重要问题之一，而对《切韵》系韵书的分合则较少涉及。从陆法言的193韵到王仁昫的195韵，再到《广韵》206韵，其间变化的性质很值得我们探讨。本文主要从历时角度进行比较研究，往上是古音溯源，往下则是现代方言，以确定13个韵分合的性质，了解语音发展的规律。首先是我们对这些韵在《切韵》系韵书中的反切系统加以对比，然后从对音材料、韵文材料入手，最后利用现代汉语方言，特别是文白异读系统来说明问题。本文共分五个部分。更多还原

【Abstract】 The character of Qie Yun which the scholars have been studying for so long years is one of the important topics of conversation. But they seldom refer to the departure and development of Finals in the series of books of Qie Yun . The change from Lufayan about 193 Finals to Wangrenxu about 195 Finals and to 206 Finals in Guang Yun is worth inquiring for us. The thesis mainly presents a general comparison and study from different aspects, in order to identify the character of departure about thirteen Finals and find out some rules about phonetic development.To begin with the comparison of the Fan Qie system among the series of books about Qie Yun. Then we will inquire into the question by making use of the materials. At last, we analyze the question among the Contemporary Dialect, especially the different pronunciation system of the South Min Dialect in written language and vernacular. The whole thesis is composed of five chapters.更多还原