【摘要】 【目的】了解新质生产力背景下，学术期刊编辑数智化素养的现状，并构建培育路径，赋能学术期刊高质量发展。【方法】在预调研的基础上，编制学术期刊编辑数智化素养调研问卷，通过编辑微信群、QQ群等线上渠道对348名编辑发放问卷星电子问卷，针对问卷结果展开实证分析。【结果】调研结果显示，数智化工具是期刊编辑的常规使用工具（68.1%）；编辑在学术数据库（91.4%）、社交媒体推广（62.1%）和AI辅助审稿（85.3%）等基础技能的使用上较为熟练，但在数据可视化分析、数字化排版、期刊影响力数据挖掘等领域相对使用不足。不同学历、职称的编辑群体数智编辑力得分有差异（P<0.01）；多数编辑认为应用数智化工具的主要困难是缺乏系统性培训（77.6%），培训需求高度集中于AI审稿（85.3%）、数据分析与可视化技能（76.7%）等实用技能。【结论】基于实证研究分析，确立了内外因协同、理论实践结合和精准识别3项基本遵循，构建由编辑个体-编辑部-国家/行业学会三方联合协同推进、贯穿“内驱激活-学习规划-制度保障-实践赋能-标准引领-平台支撑”全过程的学术期刊编辑数智化素养培育路径框架。更多还原

【Abstract】 [Purposes] To investigate the current situation of the digital and intelligent literacy among academic journal editors in the context of new quality productivity and construct cultivation pathways to empower the high-quality development of academic journals. [Methods] Based on preliminary research, an online questionnaire was developed to assess the editors’ digital-intelligent literacy. We distributed online questionnaires via We Chat and QQ groups to 348 editors using WJX(an online platform for questionnaire design and data collection). Empirical analysis was conducted based on the data from the questionnaire survey. [Findings] The survey revealed that digital and intelligent tools are commonly used by academic journal editors(68.1%). Editors demonstrated proficiency in basic skills such as academic database utilization(91.4%), social media promotion(62.1%), and AIassisted peer review(85.3%). However, the applications in fields such as data visualization analysis, digital layout, and data mining of journal impact were relatively insufficient. Significant differences were found in digital editing competency scores among editors with varying educational backgrounds, professional titles, and familiarity with digital tools(P<0.01). Most editors identified the lack of systematic training as the primary obstacle to applying digital and intelligent tools(77.6%), with training demands highly concentrated on practical skills like AI-assisted peer review(85.3%), and data analysis and visualization(76.7%). [Conclusions] Based on the empirical analysis, the study proposes three basic principles: internal-external collaboration, integration of theory and practice, and precise identification. It constructs a framework for cultivating digital and intelligent literacy among academic journal editors, involving a collaboration among individual editors, editorial offices, and industry associations. This framework covers the overall process of internal motivation activation, learning planning, institutional safeguards, practical empowerment, standard guidance, and platform support.更多还原