【摘要】 构建多元共治的现代环境治理体系，是实现水环境高质量发展的关键路径。然而，现有关于协作治理的研究尚不足以解释地方政府如何高效开展水环境多元共治。因此，该研究结合制度逻辑视角，选取生态环境部公布的4个优秀案例为研究对象，分析了水环境治理场域中的政府逻辑、市场逻辑和社区逻辑间的冲突发生和管理过程，揭示了中国情境下水环境多元共治的实现机制。研究发现：(1)多重制度逻辑变革受到外部环境和政府实践的双重驱动，在这个过程中，多重制度逻辑的手段和目标均发生变化，多重制度逻辑间的关系经历了从疏离型转向竞争型最后逐渐过渡到均衡型；(2)基于不同的多重制度逻辑关系，地方政府会采取差异化的冲突管理策略，针对疏离型关系，地方政府采取妥协和回避冲突的策略，针对竞争型关系，地方政府采取自我调适和标准化治理策略，但对化解冲突产生了矛盾的结果，而在竞争型到均衡型的过渡阶段，地方政府采取自我调适、资源整合、混合、扩展等策略，最终实现多重制度逻辑的兼容；(3)该研究进一步揭示水环境多元共治的实现机制，即“地方政府有效管理多重制度逻辑，实现多重制度逻辑从冲突走向兼容”。该研究将制度逻辑的视角引入地方政府水环境治理的研究中，揭示了地方政府水环境治理中管理多重制度逻辑的“外部环境—制度逻辑—组织实践”的动态过程，打开了地方政府水环境治理中管理多重制度逻辑的过程黑箱，并为地方政府有效开展协作治理实现多元共治提供了一个必要的前因维度。更多还原

【Abstract】 Constructing a modern environmental governance system featuring pluralistic co-governance is a pivotal approach to achieving high-quality development of the water environment. However, existing research on collaborative governance remains insufficient to explain how local governments can efficiently implement pluralistic co-governance. Therefore, from an institutional logic perspective, this study selected four exemplary cases documented by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment as research samples and analyzed the emergence and management of conflicts among state, market, and community logics within the field of water environment governance, thereby revealing a process mechanism by which pluralistic co-governance of the water environment was realized in the Chinese context. The findings indicated that:(1) Changes in multiple institutional logics were driven by both the external environment and governmental practices. During this process, both the means and goals of these logics evolved, with their relationships shifting from estranged, to competitive, to finally to aligned.(2) Based on differing relationships among multiple institutional logics, local governments adopted differentiated conflict management strategies. Under estranged relationships, they adopted compromise and avoidance strategies. Under competitive relationships, they employed self-adjustment and standardization strategies, which, however, yielded paradoxical outcomes in conflict resolution. During the transition from competitive to aligned relationships, local governments adopted self-adjustment, resource integration, hybridization, and expansion strategies, ultimately achieving compatibility among multiple institutional logics.(3) The study further revealed the mechanism for achieving pluralistic co-governance of the water environment, namely, that “local governments effectively managed multiple institutional logics, facilitating their transition from conflict to compatibility.” By introducing the institutional logic perspective into the study of local government water environment governance, this study uncovers the dynamic process of how local governments manage multiple institutional logics through the interaction of “external environment-institutional logicorganizational practice.” The study opens the “black box” of managing multiple institutional logics in local government water environment governance and provides a critical antecedent dimension for understanding how local governments can effectively implement collaborative governance and achieve pluralistic co-governance.更多还原