节点文献

深部热流体活动背景下氦气的成因来源与运聚机制——以莺歌海盆地乐东底辟区为例

Genetic source, migration and accumulation of helium under deep hydrothermal fluid activities: A case study of Ledong diapir area in Yinggehai Basin, South China Sea

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 冯子齐; 郝芳; 胡林; 胡高伟; 张亚震; 黎阳明; 王维; 李昊; 肖俊杰; 田金强;

【Author】 FENG Ziqi;HAO Fang;HU Lin;HU Gaowei;ZHANG Yazhen;LI Yangming;WANG Wei;LI Hao;XIAO Junjie;TIAN Jinqiang;State Key Laboratory of Deep Oil and Gas, China University of Petroleum (East China);School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (East China);Laboratory for Marine Mineral Resources, Qingdao Marine Science and Technology Center;Hainan Branch of CNOOC (China) Co., Ltd.;

【机构】 深层油气全国重点实验室(中国石油大学(华东)); 中国石油大学(华东)地球科学与技术学院; 青岛海洋科技中心海洋矿产资源评价与探测技术功能实验室; 中海石油(中国)有限公司海南分公司;

【摘要】 基于地球化学参数及分析数据,应用热守恒方程、质量平衡定律及瑞利分馏模型等方法,通过对莺歌海盆地乐东底辟区的壳源氦气原位产率和外部通量、幔源初始氦浓度及热驱动机制等定量分析,探讨深部热流体活动背景下氦气的成因来源及运聚机制。研究结果表明:(1)乐东底辟区氦气的来源以壳源氦为主,幔源为辅。其中,研究区幔源3He/4He值为(0.002~2.190)×10-6,R/Ra值为0.01~1.52,测算幔源He贡献占比为0.09%~19.84%,占比较小;而壳源贡献占比则高达80%以上。(2)壳源氦的原位4He产量仅为(4.10~4.25)×10-4 cm3/g,外部4He通量则显著高值,为(5.84~9.06)×10-2 cm3/g,表明壳源氦气以外部输入为主,推测与地层流体受大气补给以及深部岩石-水相互作用有关。(3)底辟区深部热流体活动显著影响地温场,3He初始质量体积与对应焓的比值(W)为(0.004~0.018)×10-11 cm3/J,来自深部地幔的热贡献(XM)为7.63%~36.18%,揭示底辟热流体对幔源3He迁移具有一定的热驱动作用。(4)研究区氦气的初次运移方式以平流为主,二次运移受控于水热脱气和气液分离过程;氦气从深部至浅部的运移过程中,CO2/3He值由1.34×109升至486×109,指示受到壳幔混合和脱气效应影响,存在CO2规模性析出和3He的明显逸散。在深部热流体影响下,氦气运移聚集机制包括:深部热驱动扩散、平流释放、垂向水热脱气,浅部横向迁移、远离断裂的圈闭聚集,分压平衡、完整密闭的盖层封存等方面。

【Abstract】 Based on the geochemical parameters and analytical data, the heat conservation equation, mass balance law, Rayleigh fractionation model and other methods were used to quantify the in-situ yield and external flux of crust-derived helium, and the initial He concentration and thermal driving mechanism of mantle-derived helium, in the Ledong Diapir area, the Yinggehai Basin, in order to understand the genetic source and migration & accumulation mechanisms of helium under deep hydrothermal fluid activities. The helium in the Ledong diapir area is primarily derived from the crust and a small amount from the mantle. For mantle-derived helium, the 3He/4He values are(0.002–2.190)×10-6, the R/Ra values are 0.01–1.52, and the contribution is estimated to be 0.09%–19.84%, suggesting a relatively small percentage. In contrast, the contribution of crust-derived helium is more than 80%. For crust-sourced helium, the in-situ 4He yield is only(4.10–4.25)×10-4 cm3/g, while the external 4He flux is significantly high, being(5.84–9.06)×10-2 cm3/g, indicating that crust-sourced helium is dominated by external input, which is speculated to be related to atmospheric recharge of formation fluids and deep rock-water interaction. Deep hydrothermal fluid in the diapir area significantly affects the geothermal field. The ratio of the initial mass volume of 3He to the corresponding enthalpy(W) is(0.006–0.018)×10-11 cm3/J, and the thermal contribution from the deep mantle(XM) is between 7.63% and 36.18%, suggesting that the diapir thermal fluid plays a certain role in driving the migration of mantle-sourced 3He. The primary migration of helium in the study area is dominated by advection, and the secondary migration is controlled by hydrothermal degassing and gas-liquid separation. During the migration of helium from deep to shallow, the CO2/3He value increases from 1.34×109 to 486×109, indicating the large-scale precipitation of CO2 and apparent escape of 3He due to the effect of crust-mantle mixing and degassing. Under the influence of deep hydrothermal fluid, the migration and accumulation mechanisms of helium include: deep heat driven diffusion, advection release, vertical hydrothermal degassing; shallow lateral migration, accumulation in traps far from faults; partial pressure balance, complete cover sealing; and so on.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金(41821002,42272163,42072167);崂山实验室科技创新项目(LSKJ202203403);中海石油(中国)有限公司海南分公司“南海大中型天然气田形成条件、勘探潜力与突破方向”项目(KJZH-2021-0003-00)
  • 【文献出处】 石油勘探与开发 ,Petroleum Exploration and Development , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年03期
  • 【分类号】P618.13
  • 【下载频次】253
节点文献中: