【摘要】 《颜氏家训》对前人的名、字与小名多有批评，有的切中要害，如翁归、翁宠，命名时确实考虑不周；有的将名与小名混为一谈，如虮虱之与犬子、狗子、驴驹、豚子，未能注意各自的产生背景与特点；有的认为字面不够吉利，如孟少孤、许思妣，忽视二人取字时纪念父母的心意。令人产生不同认识的主要原因在于评价标准的不同：颜之推遵循儒家规范，站在士族阶层立场，批评有悖于自己观念的命名取字现象；以现今标准看，这些批评意见，不少依然具有借鉴意义，有的则显得不切实际，需要我们分析对待。更多还原

【Abstract】 Admonitions for the Yan Clan criticized the predecessors’ given names, names and nicknames, with some hitting the nail on the head, such as Weng Gui and Weng Chong, which were thoughtlessly named indeed. However, some given names were mistakenly mixed with nicknames, such as equating Ji Shi with Quanzi, Gouzi, Lvjv, Tunzi, without paying attention to their respective backgrounds and characteristics. Some were believed to be not auspicious literally, such as Meng Shaogu and Xu Sibi, which ignored the fact that when the names were given, they were intended to commemorate their parents. The main reason for different perceptions lies in different evaluation criteria. Following Confucian norms, Yan Zhitui stood in the position of the upper class, and criticized the phenomenon of naming and styling that went against his ideas. In light of today’s standards, some criticisms are still enlightening, while others are unrealistic and entail our analysis.更多还原