节点文献

Comparison of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization,quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization, and quantum evolutionary algorithm for preparation of quantum states

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 程鑫; 鲁秀娟; 刘亚楠; 匡森;

【Author】 Xin Cheng;Xiu-Juan Lu;Ya-Nan Liu;Sen Kuang;Department of Automation, University of Science and Technology of China;Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong;Quantum Machines Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University;

【通讯作者】 匡森;

【机构】 Department of Automation, University of Science and Technology of China; Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong; Quantum Machines Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University;

【摘要】 Four intelligent optimization algorithms are compared by searching for control pulses to achieve the preparation of target quantum states for closed and open quantum systems, which include differential evolution(DE), particle swarm optimization(PSO), quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization(QPSO), and quantum evolutionary algorithm(QEA).We compare their control performance and point out their differences. By sampling and learning for uncertain quantum systems, the robustness of control pulses found by these four algorithms is also demonstrated and compared. The resulting research shows that the QPSO nearly outperforms the other three algorithms for all the performance criteria considered.This conclusion provides an important reference for solving complex quantum control problems by optimization algorithms and makes the QPSO be a powerful optimization tool.

【Abstract】 Four intelligent optimization algorithms are compared by searching for control pulses to achieve the preparation of target quantum states for closed and open quantum systems, which include differential evolution(DE), particle swarm optimization(PSO), quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization(QPSO), and quantum evolutionary algorithm(QEA).We compare their control performance and point out their differences. By sampling and learning for uncertain quantum systems, the robustness of control pulses found by these four algorithms is also demonstrated and compared. The resulting research shows that the QPSO nearly outperforms the other three algorithms for all the performance criteria considered.This conclusion provides an important reference for solving complex quantum control problems by optimization algorithms and makes the QPSO be a powerful optimization tool.

【基金】 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61873251)
  • 【文献出处】 Chinese Physics B ,中国物理B , 编辑部邮箱 ,2023年02期
  • 【分类号】O413;TP18
  • 【下载频次】5
节点文献中: