【摘要】 《〈雷雨〉人物谈》数十年间的版本流变是戏剧文学批评发展的一面特殊镜像，在该评论文本的成型过程中，涉及多方面复杂因素的共同合力。内中有六种版本流变的形式：其一，随着时代变迁，批评家自身看法转变；其二，批评家依据编辑部的意见，对文章进行增补；其三，批评家吸收了同行意见，删去部分文字；其四，批评家读到作家修改的作品，原先的意见发生改变；其五，批评家读到作家的自我评价，受其激发，将原本的意见“雏形”写成文章；其六，批评家依据作家确认的史实，更正原本批评中的讹误。由此既可推进相关个案研究，亦可见出戏剧文学批评在版本变迁的过程中，存在批评家、编辑部、读者、作家间的多重互动及作用。更多还原

【Abstract】 The evolution of The Character Analysis of Thunderstorm in the past few decades is a special mirror of the development of drama criticism. The analysis of its four different versions shows that the generation of a commentary text is the result of a variety of factors working together. The evolution falls into six categories: first, the critic’s views change over time; second, the critic supplements his writing according to editorial suggestions; third, the critic absorbs others’ opinions and deletes parts of his writing; fourth, the critic changes his original opinions in accordance with the changes the writer makes to the dramatic text concerned; fifth, inspired by the writer’s evaluation of his own work, the critic develops his “embryonic” opinions into an article; sixth, following the historical facts confirmed by the writer, the critic corrects the errors in the original writing. The present research can not only promote the case study of the text concerned, but also help to show the multi-layer interactions among critics, editors, readers, and writers during the evolution of drama criticism.更多还原