【摘要】 民事检察公益诉讼制度检察机关角色定位学说可以分为支持原告身份学说和支持法律监督者身份学说，但尚未有学说专门讨论两种身份能否实质性共存的问题。实践经验表明检察机关办理民事公益诉讼案件具有法律监督者身份，支撑原告身份学说或法律监督者身份学说的理由又不能完全排斥彼方成立，因此，两种身份存在实质性共存的可能。实质平等理念下法律监督者身份是达到两造平衡状态中“普通原告”的需要，法律监督权与当事人证明权的融合则为二者在“公益诉讼起诉人”涵义内融会贯通提供可能。更多还原

【Abstract】 The theory of role positioning of procuratorial organs in civil procuratorial public interest litigation system can be divided into the theory of plaintiff identity and the theory of legal supervisor identity, but there is no theory to discuss whether these two identities can coexist substantively. Practical experience shows that procuratorial organs have the identity of legal supervisor when handling civil public interest litigation cases, and the reasons supporting the theory of plaintiff identity or the theory of legal supervisor identity cannot completely exclude the other party. Therefore, the two identities have the possibility of substantive coexistence. Under the concept of substantive equality, the identity of legal supervisor is the need of “ordinary plaintiff” in the equilibrium state of the two, and the integration of legal supervision right and party’s proof right provides the possibility for the two to integrate in the meaning of “public interest litigation prosecutor”.更多还原