【摘要】 在现代化研究中,要把现代化范式与革命范式结合起来,现代化范式并不否定革命动力作用,现代化历史包含了革命史,通过中日比较更能理解革命在近代化过程中的动力作用。现代化范式、革命范式和比较研究范式结合起来,共同形成现代化比较研究范式。中日近代化动力是人民斗争,并主要是反帝反封建的农民革命。近代两国革命形态主要是农民土地革命,性质是资产阶级革命。日本幕府末期和明治维新时期革命具有这样的形态和性质,而中国晚清太平天国运动等农民革命不具有这样的形态和性质,新民主主义革命才具有,因而日本近代化速度快于中国。中日近代化历史研究要充分肯定革命在近代化过程中的动力作用,反对否定暴力革命的历史虚无主义。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the study of modernization, we should combine the paradigm of modernization with that of revolution, for the former does not deny the role of revolutionary forces, the history of modernization includes the history of revolution, and the dynamic role of revolution in modernization can be better understood through the comparison between China and Japan. The combination of the two paradigms with comparison paradigm gives birth to the paradigm of comparative study of modernization.The motive force of the modernization of China and Japan was the people’s struggle, mainly the peasant revolution against imperialism and feudalism.In modern history, the revolutionary pattern in both countries was mainly peasant land revolution, a bourgeois revolution in nature.The revolution in Japan at the end of the shogunate and in the Meiji Restoration had this shape and character, but the peasant movements such as the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom in the late Qing Dynasty did not have such a form and nature while the new democratic revolution had such a shape and nature, showing that Japan’s modernization was faster than China’s.When studying the history of modernization of China and Japan, we should fully affirm the dynamic role of revolution in modernization and combat the historical nihilism that negated the violent revolution.更多还原