【摘要】 "三审制"是学术期刊必须恪守的三级审稿制度。来稿要通过编辑初审、专家二审、主编(或)编委会终审才能录用。一般情况下,一审和三审(终审)都在编辑部内部完成,因此,二审(又称为外审,即同行专家复审)就显得尤为重要。文中围绕二审的开展比较了常见的几种审稿模式,提出双向匿名审稿制度是当今国内最科学、最适宜的审稿制度;探讨了国内学术期刊难以开展双向匿名审稿的深层次原因,提出了优化双向匿名审稿的科学化流程,能够最大限度地发挥双向匿名审稿的防弊作用,实现由内至外的全方位覆盖。更多还原

【Abstract】 "The three-level review system"is a three-level review system that academic journals must abide by.The manuscript can only be employed after the first review by editors,the second review by experts,and the final review by the editor(or)editorial board.Generally,the first and third trials(final)are completed in the editorial department.Therefore,the second trial(also known as the external trial,that is,peer expert review)is particularly important.In this paper,several common review modes are compared around the development of the second review,and it is proposed that the two-level anonymous review system is the most scientific and appropriate review system in China;the deep-seated reasons why it is difficult for domestic academic journals to carry out two-level anonymous review are discussed,and the scientific process of optimizing two-level anonymous review is proposed,which can maximize the anti-fraud effect of two-level anonymous review thus covering from inside to outside.更多还原