【摘要】 一些学者将排他性论证中的因果关系解释为特定内涵,并以此消除排他性论证,我们将这种研究称作"因果释义"进路。本文分析了两种因果释义进路:反事实条件句的释义进路和INUS理论的释义进路。经分析,这两种方案都无法彻底消除排他性论证。在此基础上,我们进一步分析了因果释义进路的本质,讨论了它不能彻底消除排他性论证的原因。最后的结论是:排他性论证的排斥性并不来源于因果关系本身,所以对因果关系赋予特定解释不能消解排他性论证,因果释义并不是消除排他性论证的有效途径。更多还原

【Abstract】 Some scholars interpret the causality in the exclusion argumentation as a specific connotation so as to eliminate the argument. We call this kind of research as the "causal interpretation" approach. This paper analyzes two approaches of causal interpretation: the interpretation of counterfactual theory and the interpretation of INUS theory. Through analysis, we have found neither of the approaches can completely eliminate the exclusion argument. On this basis, we have analyzed the essence of the interpretation approach and discussed the reasons why it won’t work. The final conclusion is that the exclusion of the argument does not originate from causation itself. So to interpret causality as the specific connotation cannot dispel the argumentation. Causal interpretation is not an effective way to eliminate the exclusion argument.更多还原